Hi Vincent,
Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vincent Povirk vincent@codeweavers.com
Signed-off-by: Vincent Povirk vincent@codeweavers.com
I'm not opposed that you're taking my patches from the staging tree, but in this particular case it's not really clear that the bug with converting 32bppGrayFloat to 8bppGray was debugged and found by somebody else.
Adding "Spotted by ..." would be enough and appropriate, since for some reason you didn't like the version of the patch in staging and decided to fix the bug in a different way.
Oh, I didn't think of that, sorry.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vincent Povirk vincent@codeweavers.com
Signed-off-by: Vincent Povirk vincent@codeweavers.com
I'm not opposed that you're taking my patches from the staging tree, but in this particular case it's not really clear that the bug with converting 32bppGrayFloat to 8bppGray was debugged and found by somebody else.
Adding "Spotted by ..." would be enough and appropriate, since for some reason you didn't like the version of the patch in staging and decided to fix the bug in a different way.
-- Dmitry.
Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, I didn't think of that, sorry.
If you are going to resend the patch please consider adding an explanation why a separate branch is required to handle the conversion.