Andriy Palamarchuk apa3a@yahoo.com writes:
The last week I submitted a few patches, including a couple patches for these functions.
The patches have not been committed yet. Is there anything wrong with them?
I'm still not satisfied with the design. Having a big reload function is not a good idea IMO, you don't want to have to load all parameters on startup when most are never used. Also we need a way to make parameter changes work across multiple processes.
--- Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.com wrote:
Andriy Palamarchuk apa3a@yahoo.com writes:
The last week I submitted a few patches, including
a
couple patches for these functions.
The patches have not been committed yet. Is there anything wrong with them?
I'm still not satisfied with the design. Having a big reload function is not a good idea IMO, you don't want to have to load all parameters on startup when most are never used.
Do you think it is better to do lazy loading for most parameters?
Also we need a way to make parameter changes work across multiple processes.
I'll think about it more. Originally I planned to broadcast change notification across processes and use the reload function in other process to refresh values from registry. The problem with this approach is when a parameter is changed without saving.
Andriy Palamarchuk
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com