Re: [8/8] d3d8: Use D3DPRIMITIVETYPE -> WINED3DPRIMITIVETYPE enum conversion function instead of implicit conversion (clang)

[Stefan Dösinger]

Am 29.05.2011 um 19:35 schrieb Frédéric Delanoy:
> Please skip this patch; it needs adaptation to avoid rebasing/merge
> conflicts due to changes to be done in patch " [7/8] d3d8: Use
> D3DRENDERSTATETYPE -> WINED3DRENDERSTATETYPE enum conversion function
> instead of implicit conversion (clang)."
>
> I'll resend both patches in a subsequent series.

To avoid confusion it is better to resend them as [7/8] and [8/8] as long as the original patches aren't applied. Now I'd recommend you to wait until today's commit wave before resending anything else to see which patches are applied and resend the others.

[8/8] d3d8: Use D3DPRIMITIVETYPE -> WINED3DPRIMITIVETYPE enum conversion function instead of implicit conversion (clang)

[Frédéric Delanoy]

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:58, Stefan Dösinger  wrote:
> Am 29.05.2011 um 19:35 schrieb Frédéric Delanoy:
> > Please skip this patch; it needs adaptation to avoid rebasing/merge
> > conflicts due to changes to be done in patch " [7/8] d3d8: Use
> > D3DRENDERSTATETYPE -> WINED3DRENDERSTATETYPE enum conversion function
> > instead of implicit conversion (clang)."
> >
> > I'll resend both patches in a subsequent series.
>
> To avoid confusion it is better to resend them as [7/8] and [8/8] as long as the original patches aren't applied. Now I'd recommend you to wait until today's commit wave before resending anything else to see which patches are applied and resend the others.

Yeah right, I changed/adapted the title in [7/8] since the conv
function wasn't needed anymore and thought that if I used a [7/8] with
another subject and (try 2) it wouldn't be noticed straightforwardly.

Frédéric

[8/8] d3d8: Use D3DPRIMITIVETYPE -> WINED3DPRIMITIVETYPE enum conversion function instead of implicit conversion (clang)

[Stefan Dösinger]

On Monday 30 May 2011 11:29:26 Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> Yeah right, I changed/adapted the title in [7/8] since the conv
> function wasn't needed anymore and thought that if I used a [7/8] with
> another subject and (try 2) it wouldn't be noticed straightforwardly.

Nah, Alexandre's scripts work very well there, and if the scripts don't figure 
it out he does. However if you restart your numbering you'll confuse the 
winetestbot. Your patches don't change the tests though so the testbot didn't 
complain.