From: Andre Hentschel and now without the 9x stuff the result page looks better again, someone just need to fix his user32 test :)
Frankly, I'm a bit surprised and disappointed to see that people are not taking responsibility for fixing failures they introduced in tests. I don't expect to have time to clean up after them for the next month or so.
Greg.
Frankly, I'm a bit surprised and disappointed to see that people are not taking responsibility for fixing failures they introduced in tests. I don't expect to have time to clean up after them for the next month or so.
Hopefully, if we can get the tests passing as a more normal occurrence, we can make not introducing new failures a stronger requirement than it already is. --Juan
Juan Lang juan.lang@gmail.com writes:
Frankly, I'm a bit surprised and disappointed to see that people are not taking responsibility for fixing failures they introduced in tests. I don't expect to have time to clean up after them for the next month or so.
Hopefully, if we can get the tests passing as a more normal occurrence, we can make not introducing new failures a stronger requirement than it already is.
It's already a strict requirement, but failures don't always get caught by the testbot, especially when they are triggered by some previous test.
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Greg Geldorp -
Juan Lang