Hi,
for translation (to German) purposes I wonder which pages of the winehq.org website are most frequented (are there HTTP request statistics?) and which are deemed most important so I can focus on them in order.
It would also be interesting to know which pages are going to be moved to the Wiki eventually so I don't waste effort translating these.
Everything that is shown on the start page plus some other pages are done and I'm looking for direction on where to continue.
Cheers, -Maik
Maik Schulz wrote:
Hi,
for translation (to German) purposes I wonder which pages of the winehq.org website are most frequented (are there HTTP request statistics?) and which are deemed most important so I can focus on them in order.
It would also be interesting to know which pages are going to be moved to the Wiki eventually so I don't waste effort translating these.
Everything that is shown on the start page plus some other pages are done and I'm looking for direction on where to continue.
Cheers, -Maik
Not sure if this will help you:
http://www.winehq.org/webalizer/index.html
Hi Paul,
it's a good pointer to start, thanks.
For the other two points: Does anybody have an opinion on the importance of pages as well as which ones should be moved to the Wiki?
Cheers, -Maik
On 28 May 2009, at 10:13, Paul Vriens wrote:
Maik Schulz wrote:
Hi, for translation (to German) purposes I wonder which pages of the winehq.org website are most frequented (are there HTTP request statistics?) and which are deemed most important so I can focus on them in order. It would also be interesting to know which pages are going to be moved to the Wiki eventually so I don't waste effort translating these. Everything that is shown on the start page plus some other pages are done and I'm looking for direction on where to continue. Cheers, -Maik
Not sure if this will help you:
http://www.winehq.org/webalizer/index.html
-- Cheers,
Paul.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Maik Schulz maik.schulz@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
it's a good pointer to start, thanks.
For the other two points: Does anybody have an opinion on the importance of pages as well as which ones should be moved to the Wiki?
Please bottom post on wine mailing lists.
As for your questions, importance is a bit hard to say. Important to users, or to potential developers?
For the wiki, a lot of it should be eventually, but some have objected doing so until the wiki's theme is updated to match WineHQ's.
On 28 May 2009, at 17:10, Austin English wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Maik Schulz maik.schulz@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
it's a good pointer to start, thanks.
For the other two points: Does anybody have an opinion on the importance of pages as well as which ones should be moved to the Wiki?
Please bottom post on wine mailing lists.
As for your questions, importance is a bit hard to say. Important to users, or to potential developers?
For the wiki, a lot of it should be eventually, but some have objected doing so until the wiki's theme is updated to match WineHQ's.
-- -Austin
NP. Importance to whom is a good question--who is the target group for winehq.org? Or who benefits most from it? Importance to that latter group is what I'm after.
Looking at the webalizer output, the most popular pages are the start page, the download page, the news, the site search, the about page, and the help page (taken from the top 10 URLs). From this I gather that it's mostly users that frequent winehq.org.
The latest patch to the developer page actually put the link to the wiki as the topmost with the comment that it typically has more recent information than the web pages.
Does that make it safe to assume that winehq.org should concentrate on users and wiki.winehq.org on (potential) developers? If that's the direction then it's more clear which content to translate.
Cheers, -Maik
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Maik Schulz maik.schulz@gmail.com wrote:
Does that make it safe to assume that winehq.org should concentrate on users and wiki.winehq.org on (potential) developers? If that's the direction then it's more clear which content to translate.
Sounds reasonable.
Austin English schrieb:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Maik Schulz maik.schulz@gmail.com wrote:
Does that make it safe to assume that winehq.org should concentrate on users and wiki.winehq.org on (potential) developers? If that's the direction then it's more clear which content to translate.
Sounds reasonable.
i think we should focus on users, because developers should be able to read english. they have to correspondend here in english, so i guess they can.
-
André Hentschel -
Austin English -
Maik Schulz -
Paul Vriens