Re: ole32: add a test for OleInitialize

[Paul Vriens]

Austin English wrote:
> Pointed out by Anastasius in bug 13011. Tested on XP SP2 & 2K SP4 (and
> Wine, of course).

Hi Austin,

The test case that is pointed out in bug 13011 is different though:

hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);

The above succeeds on W2K3 but fails on Wine.

ole32: add a test for OleInitialize

[Austin English]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
> > Pointed out by Anastasius in bug 13011. Tested on XP SP2 & 2K SP4 (and
> > Wine, of course).
>
> Hi Austin,
>
> The test case that is pointed out in bug 13011 is different though:
>
> hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
>
> The above succeeds on W2K3 but fails on Wine.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.

I was referring to this comment:
"Calling OleInitialize() for the first time should yield S_OK - even with
apartment already initialized by previous CoInitialize(Ex) calls.
Calling OleInitialize() more than once yields S_FALSE for the second and
following calls."

Though that testcase should probably be added as well, in a todo_wine of course.

ole32: add a test for OleInitialize

[Paul Vriens]

Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> > Austin English wrote:
> > > Pointed out by Anastasius in bug 13011. Tested on XP SP2 & 2K SP4 (and
> > > Wine, of course).
> >
> > Hi Austin,
> >
> > The test case that is pointed out in bug 13011 is different though:
> >
> > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> >
> > The above succeeds on W2K3 but fails on Wine.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Paul.
>
> I was referring to this comment:
> "Calling OleInitialize() for the first time should yield S_OK - even with
> apartment already initialized by previous CoInitialize(Ex) calls.
> Calling OleInitialize() more than once yields S_FALSE for the second and
> following calls."
>
> Though that testcase should probably be added as well, in a todo_wine of course.

So maybe we should do

hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
todo_wine
ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
ok(hr == S_FALSE, "Expected S_FALSE, hr = 0x%08x\n", hr);

and move that to a separate test function? (Maybe in compobj.c?) I mean it's a 
ole32 basic thing that's wrong, not something that should be in a specific test 
I guess?

ole32: add a test for OleInitialize

[Austin English]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Paul Vriens 
> > wrote:
> > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > Pointed out by Anastasius in bug 13011. Tested on XP SP2 & 2K SP4 (and
> > > > Wine, of course).
> > >
> > > Hi Austin,
> > >
> > > The test case that is pointed out in bug 13011 is different though:
> > >
> > > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > >
> > > The above succeeds on W2K3 but fails on Wine.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Paul.
> >
> > I was referring to this comment:
> > "Calling OleInitialize() for the first time should yield S_OK - even with
> > apartment already initialized by previous CoInitialize(Ex) calls.
> > Calling OleInitialize() more than once yields S_FALSE for the second and
> > following calls."
> >
> > Though that testcase should probably be added as well, in a todo_wine of
> > course.
>
> So maybe we should do
>
> hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> todo_wine
> ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> ok(hr == S_FALSE, "Expected S_FALSE, hr = 0x%08x\n", hr);
>
> and move that to a separate test function? (Maybe in compobj.c?) I mean it's
> a ole32 basic thing that's wrong, not something that should be in a specific
> test I guess?
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.

How's this?

ole32: add a test for OleInitialize

[Paul Vriens]

Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> > Austin English wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Paul Vriens 
> > > wrote:
> > > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > > Pointed out by Anastasius in bug 13011. Tested on XP SP2 & 2K SP4 (and
> > > > > Wine, of course).
> > > >
> > > > Hi Austin,
> > > >
> > > > The test case that is pointed out in bug 13011 is different though:
> > > >
> > > > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > >
> > > > The above succeeds on W2K3 but fails on Wine.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Paul.
> > >
> > > I was referring to this comment:
> > > "Calling OleInitialize() for the first time should yield S_OK - even with
> > > apartment already initialized by previous CoInitialize(Ex) calls.
> > > Calling OleInitialize() more than once yields S_FALSE for the second and
> > > following calls."
> > >
> > > Though that testcase should probably be added as well, in a todo_wine of
> > > course.
> >
> > So maybe we should do
> >
> > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > todo_wine
> > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > ok(hr == S_FALSE, "Expected S_FALSE, hr = 0x%08x\n", hr);
> >
> > and move that to a separate test function? (Maybe in compobj.c?) I mean it's
> > a ole32 basic thing that's wrong, not something that should be in a specific
> > test I guess?
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Paul.
>
> How's this?

Looks great :). Two (minor) things though:

- you should maybe use pCoInitializeEx? (there is some remark in that file about 
it not being present on all platforms, current test.winehq.org doesn't show this 
though)
- do some uninitialize to clean things up?

ole32: add a test for OleInitialize

[Paul Vriens]

Paul Vriens wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Paul Vriens 
> >  wrote:
> > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Paul Vriens 
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > > > Pointed out by Anastasius in bug 13011. Tested on XP SP2 & 2K SP4 
> > > > > > (and
> > > > > > Wine, of course).
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Austin,
> > > > >
> > > > > The test case that is pointed out in bug 13011 is different though:
> > > > >
> > > > > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > >
> > > > > The above succeeds on W2K3 but fails on Wine.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul.
> > > >
> > > > I was referring to this comment:
> > > > "Calling OleInitialize() for the first time should yield S_OK - even 
> > > > with
> > > > apartment already initialized by previous CoInitialize(Ex) calls.
> > > > Calling OleInitialize() more than once yields S_FALSE for the second 
> > > > and
> > > > following calls."
> > > >
> > > > Though that testcase should probably be added as well, in a 
> > > > todo_wine of
> > > > course.
> > >
> > > So maybe we should do
> > >
> > > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > todo_wine
> > > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > ok(hr == S_FALSE, "Expected S_FALSE, hr = 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > >
> > > and move that to a separate test function? (Maybe in compobj.c?) I 
> > > mean it's
> > > a ole32 basic thing that's wrong, not something that should be in a 
> > > specific
> > > test I guess?
> > >
> > > -- 
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Paul.
> >
> > How's this?
>
> Looks great :). Two (minor) things though:
> - you should maybe use pCoInitializeEx? (there is some remark in that
>
> file about it not being present on all platforms, current 
> test.winehq.org doesn't show this though)
> - do some uninitialize to clean things up?

I see that moniker.c also uses CoInitializeEx directly and no errors on 
test.winehq.org for that ('not run' would be shown if that was the case).

So maybe we should get rid of the GetProcAddress for CoInitializeEx in all 
files, but that would be another patch(set).

ole32: add a test for OleInitialize

[Austin English]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Paul Vriens 
> > wrote:
> > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Paul Vriens
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > > > Pointed out by Anastasius in bug 13011. Tested on XP SP2 & 2K SP4 (and
> > > > > > Wine, of course).
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Austin,
> > > > >
> > > > > The test case that is pointed out in bug 13011 is different though:
> > > > >
> > > > > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > >
> > > > > The above succeeds on W2K3 but fails on Wine.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul.
> > > >
> > > > I was referring to this comment:
> > > > "Calling OleInitialize() for the first time should yield S_OK - even
> > > > with
> > > > apartment already initialized by previous CoInitialize(Ex) calls.
> > > > Calling OleInitialize() more than once yields S_FALSE for the second and
> > > > following calls."
> > > >
> > > > Though that testcase should probably be added as well, in a todo_wine of
> > > > course.
> > >
> > > So maybe we should do
> > >
> > > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > todo_wine
> > > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > ok(hr == S_FALSE, "Expected S_FALSE, hr = 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > >
> > > and move that to a separate test function? (Maybe in compobj.c?) I mean
> > > it's
> > > a ole32 basic thing that's wrong, not something that should be in a
> > > specific
> > > test I guess?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Paul.
> >
> > How's this?
>
> Looks great :). Two (minor) things though:
> - you should maybe use pCoInitializeEx? (there is some remark in that file
>
> about it not being present on all platforms, current test.winehq.org doesn't
> show this though)
> - do some uninitialize to clean things up?
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.

I haven't tested on windows though. I can test it later today before
submitting to wine-patches [though I'm sure you'll beat me to it ;-)].

ole32: add a test for OleInitialize

[Paul Vriens]

Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> > Austin English wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Paul Vriens 
> > > wrote:
> > > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Paul Vriens
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > > > > Pointed out by Anastasius in bug 13011. Tested on XP SP2 & 2K SP4 (and
> > > > > > > Wine, of course).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Austin,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The test case that is pointed out in bug 13011 is different though:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > > > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The above succeeds on W2K3 but fails on Wine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was referring to this comment:
> > > > > "Calling OleInitialize() for the first time should yield S_OK - even
> > > > > with
> > > > > apartment already initialized by previous CoInitialize(Ex) calls.
> > > > > Calling OleInitialize() more than once yields S_FALSE for the second and
> > > > > following calls."
> > > > >
> > > > > Though that testcase should probably be added as well, in a todo_wine of
> > > > > course.
> > > >
> > > > So maybe we should do
> > > >
> > > > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > > todo_wine
> > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > > ok(hr == S_FALSE, "Expected S_FALSE, hr = 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > >
> > > > and move that to a separate test function? (Maybe in compobj.c?) I mean
> > > > it's
> > > > a ole32 basic thing that's wrong, not something that should be in a
> > > > specific
> > > > test I guess?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Paul.
> > >
> > > How's this?
> >
> > Looks great :). Two (minor) things though:
> > - you should maybe use pCoInitializeEx? (there is some remark in that file
> >
> > about it not being present on all platforms, current test.winehq.org doesn't
> > show this though)
> > - do some uninitialize to clean things up?
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Paul.
>
> I haven't tested on windows though. I can test it later today before
> submitting to wine-patches [though I'm sure you'll beat me to it ;-)].

Succeeds on Win95, W2K3 and Vista (haven't tested others).

ole32: add a test for OleInitialize

[Rolf Kalbermatter]

Paul Vriens wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
> > Paul Vriens wrote:
> > > - you should maybe use pCoInitializeEx? (there is some
> > >
> > > remark in that file about it not being present on all
> > > platforms, current test.winehq.org doesn't show this
> > > though)
> > > - do some uninitialize to clean things up?
> >
> > I haven't tested on windows though. I can test it later today before
> > submitting to wine-patches [though I'm sure you'll beat me to it ;-)].
>
> Succeeds on Win95, W2K3 and Vista (haven't tested others).

The Ex variant might be something added in one of the Win95 releases.
Posts like this
http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Microsoft_Operating_Systems/Windows/Win95
_3x/95/Win95_Setup/Q_10055969.html
seem to indicate so. Of course an IE6 installer or such might have
updated the OLE subsystem too in your case. Most probably there are not
many systems around using an original Win95 installation anymore but
still technically CoInitializeEx() may not be available on all Win95
systems.

Rolf Kalbermatter

ole32: add a test for OleInitialize

[Nikolay Sivov]

Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> > Austin English wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Paul Vriens 
> > > wrote:
> > > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Paul Vriens
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pointed out by Anastasius in bug 13011. Tested on XP SP2 & 2K SP4 (and
> > > > > > > Wine, of course).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >               
> > > > > > Hi Austin,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The test case that is pointed out in bug 13011 is different though:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > > > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The above succeeds on W2K3 but fails on Wine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was referring to this comment:
> > > > > "Calling OleInitialize() for the first time should yield S_OK - even
> > > > > with
> > > > > apartment already initialized by previous CoInitialize(Ex) calls.
> > > > > Calling OleInitialize() more than once yields S_FALSE for the second and
> > > > > following calls."
> > > > >
> > > > > Though that testcase should probably be added as well, in a todo_wine of
> > > > > course.
> > > >
> > > > So maybe we should do
> > > >
> > > > hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
> > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "CoInitializeEx failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > > todo_wine
> > > > ok(hr == S_OK, "OleInitialize failed with error 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > > hr = OleInitialize(NULL);
> > > > ok(hr == S_FALSE, "Expected S_FALSE, hr = 0x%08x\n", hr);
> > > >
> > > > and move that to a separate test function? (Maybe in compobj.c?) I mean
> > > > it's
> > > > a ole32 basic thing that's wrong, not something that should be in a
> > > > specific
> > > > test I guess?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Paul.
> > >
> > > How's this?
> >
> > Looks great :). Two (minor) things though:
> > - you should maybe use pCoInitializeEx? (there is some remark in that file
> >
> > about it not being present on all platforms, current test.winehq.org doesn't
> > show this though)
> > - do some uninitialize to clean things up?
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Paul.
>
> I haven't tested on windows though. I can test it later today before
> submitting to wine-patches [though I'm sure you'll beat me to it ;-)].

Succeeded on WinXP too.