Re: d3d9: add a few tests for GetAdapterDisplayModeEx

[Louis Lenders]

On 7 July 2010 23:39, Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> - todo_wine ok(mode_ex.ScanLineOrdering == D3DSCANLINEORDERING_PROGRESSIVE,
>
> "ScanLineOrdering is %d instead of %d\n", mode_ex.ScanLineOrdering, 
> D3DSCANLINEORDERING_PROGRESSIVE);
> - todo_wine ok(rotation == D3DDISPLAYROTATION_IDENTITY, "rotation is %d
>
> instead of %d\n", rotation, D3DDISPLAYROTATION_IDENTITY);
> These obviously depend on the actual setup of the machine running the
> test.

yeah, you have a suggestion how to change the test, or should i just leave 
them out of the test?
> It also seems likely that you're supposed to initialize
> mode_ex.Size before making the GetAdapterDisplayModeEx() call.

I did that in the test: test shows that it fails if mode_ex.Size is null, 
when it is set to sizeof(D3DDISPLAYMODEEX) it returns D3D_OK

d3d9: add a few tests for GetAdapterDisplayModeEx

[Henri Verbeet]

On 8 July 2010 00:14, Louis Lenders  wrote:
> > These obviously depend on the actual setup of the machine running the
> > test.
>
> yeah, you have a suggestion how to change the test, or should i just leave
> them out of the test?

Perhaps you can use EnumDisplaySettingsEx() or similar functions to
retrieve that information.
> > It also seems likely that you're supposed to initialize
> > mode_ex.Size before making the GetAdapterDisplayModeEx() call.
>
> I did that in the test: test shows that it fails if mode_ex.Size is null,
> when it is set to sizeof(D3DDISPLAYMODEEX) it returns D3D_OK

Sorry, I read over that.