Hi,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:21:26PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
- icinfo->dwVersion = 0x00010000; /* Version 1.0 build 0 */
- icinfo->dwVersionICM = 0x01040000; /* Version 1.4 build 0 */
This doesn't really add up. If it made complete sense, Version 1.0 build 0 would be 0x01000000. But then I assume this conflict is for real, no? (we all know why we love MS, no?)
Andreas
"Andreas Mohr" andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:21:26PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
- icinfo->dwVersion = 0x00010000; /* Version 1.0 build 0 */
- icinfo->dwVersionICM = 0x01040000; /* Version 1.4 build 0 */
This doesn't really add up. If it made complete sense, Version 1.0 build 0 would be 0x01000000. But then I assume this conflict is for real, no? (we all know why we love MS, no?)
I didn't really test what Windows returns in that fileds, just copied what msrle32 has. If you feel brave enough to test and make a patch go ahead.
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:29:04PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Andreas Mohr" andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:21:26PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
- icinfo->dwVersion = 0x00010000; /* Version 1.0 build 0 */
- icinfo->dwVersionICM = 0x01040000; /* Version 1.4 build 0 */
This doesn't really add up. If it made complete sense, Version 1.0 build 0 would be 0x01000000. But then I assume this conflict is for real, no? (we all know why we love MS, no?)
I didn't really test what Windows returns in that fileds, just copied what msrle32 has. If you feel brave enough to test and make a patch go ahead.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/multimed/ht... says dwVersionICM should be set to ICVERSION, and Google says ICVERSION is defined as 0x0104, and other internet pages directly assign a 0x0104 value.
dwVersion appears to be endianness swapped, too: I've seen 0 and 0x00020001 used several times.
Andreas
-
Andreas Mohr -
Dmitry Timoshkov