Mike Hearn mike@theoretic.com writes:
Ensure the header files work with upcoming DCOM patches
We finally have correct header dependencies now, please don't start breaking them again.
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 19:11, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mike Hearn mike@theoretic.com writes:
Ensure the header files work with upcoming DCOM patches
We finally have correct header dependencies now, please don't start breaking them again.
Hmm. How do I know what they should be? I missed the header dependencies work, not sure what I have to do here.....
On September 23, 2003 07:11 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
Hmm. How do I know what they should be? I missed the header dependencies work, not sure what I have to do here.....
Don't add/remove includes to header files, unless you *know* that include is/isn't in the MS headers. It's hard to say if you don't have them though... :)
tir, 23.09.2003 kl. 13.11 skrev Mike Hearn:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 19:11, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mike Hearn mike@theoretic.com writes:
Ensure the header files work with upcoming DCOM patches
We finally have correct header dependencies now, please don't start breaking them again.
Hmm. How do I know what they should be? I missed the header dependencies work, not sure what I have to do here.....
It seems you just shouldn't include rpcdce.h directly anywhere, but rather depend on it being included from rpc.h or the COM headers (they all include rpc.h). Otherwise you should probably tell the list what the exact problem is.