Re: [3/3] ws2_32: Always return the source address from WSAAccept.

[Bruno Jesus]

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Hans Leidekker  wrote:
> dlls/ws2_32/socket.c     | 9 +--------
>  dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c b/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c
> index c34de4b..6855298 100644
> --- a/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c
> +++ b/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c
> @@ -6546,12 +6546,8 @@ SOCKET WINAPI WSAAccept( SOCKET s, struct WS_sockaddr *addr, LPINT addrlen,
>         TRACE("Socket %04lx, sockaddr %p, addrlen %p, fnCondition %p, dwCallbackData %ld\n",
>                 s, addr, addrlen, lpfnCondition, dwCallbackData);
> -
> -
>   size = sizeof(src_addr);
> -
>   cs = WS_accept(s, &src_addr, &size);
> -
> -
>   cs = WS_accept(s, addr, addrlen);

The parameter addr may be NULL in WSAAccept, I can't check the source
code right now but what will WS_accept do in this case?

Best wishes,
Bruno

[3/3] ws2_32: Always return the source address from WSAAccept.

[Hans Leidekker]

On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 09:32 -0300, Bruno Jesus wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Hans Leidekker  wrote:
> > dlls/ws2_32/socket.c     | 9 +--------
> >  dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 6 +++---
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c b/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c
> > index c34de4b..6855298 100644
> > --- a/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c
> > +++ b/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c
> > @@ -6546,12 +6546,8 @@ SOCKET WINAPI WSAAccept( SOCKET s, struct WS_sockaddr *addr, LPINT addrlen,
> >         TRACE("Socket %04lx, sockaddr %p, addrlen %p, fnCondition %p, dwCallbackData %ld\n",
> >                 s, addr, addrlen, lpfnCondition, dwCallbackData);
> > -
> > -
> >   size = sizeof(src_addr);
> > -
> >   cs = WS_accept(s, &src_addr, &size);
> > -
> > -
> >   cs = WS_accept(s, addr, addrlen);
>
> The parameter addr may be NULL in WSAAccept, I can't check the source
> code right now but what will WS_accept do in this case?

It will skip the WS_getpeername call. Good point, I'll add some tests for this case
and resubmit the series.