At 02:38 PM 19/05/2001 +0200, you wrote:
What do you mean? It's there... http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-cvs/2001/05/0095.html
Yes :-/ I should have checked again, I was thinking that because wine-cvs input was generated automatically there could be no reason for data not to be posted to archives immediately. I checked yesterday and it seems that a delay of several hours can happen between a cvs commit and the updating of archives.
Gerard
On Sun, 20 May 2001, gerard patel wrote:
At 02:38 PM 19/05/2001 +0200, you wrote:
What do you mean? It's there... http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-cvs/2001/05/0095.html
Yes :-/ I should have checked again, I was thinking that because wine-cvs input was generated automatically there could be no reason for data not to be posted to archives immediately.
That sounds correct, even for all mailing lists, not just wine-cvs. The hypermail archives at winehq.com is updated simultaneously with the list mail being sent out to all subscribers. (This is not the case with the integrita archives, though, since integrita is just one of the subscribers, subject to the whims of the MTA.) Did you use Reload?
-
gerard patel -
Ove Kaaven