On 1/16/2010 02:12, Austin English wrote:
See bug 21320.
LIST_FOR_EACH_SAFE is inconsistent after your patch. Also I think a shorter variant something like WLIST_... is preferable, but it's a subject of discussion.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/16/2010 02:12, Austin English wrote:
See bug 21320.
LIST_FOR_EACH_SAFE is inconsistent after your patch.
It probably should, yeah, but that should be a separate patch. I'll resend as a series next week.
Also I think a shorter variant something like WLIST_... is preferable, but it's a subject of discussion.
Doesn't matter to me.