Re: dlls/user32/dde_client.c warning fixes (RESEND)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Gerald Pfeifer  writes:
> The current version likely is actually broken since the ! operator has
> a higher priority than bitwise & in C.  Unless someone really wanted to
> use a very, hmm, unusual construct here?

No, it's clearly not intended, but fixing this breaks the tests, this
would need to be addressed first.

dlls/user32/dde_client.c warning fixes (RESEND)

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Gerald Pfeifer  writes:
> > The current version likely is actually broken since the ! operator has
> > a higher priority than bitwise & in C.  Unless someone really wanted to
> > use a very, hmm, unusual construct here?
>
> No, it's clearly not intended, but fixing this breaks the tests, this
> would need to be addressed first.

Well, I found the bug and provided a fix, alas the testsuite is not 
exactly territory I feel home at. :-(  I hope we won't keep the bug
for the sake of not breaking a bogus test...

Jeff, the vast majority of dlls/user32/tests/dde.c has been contributed
by you -- is this something you could help with?

Thanks,
Gerald