[Compile problem] GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL vs. GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI

[Uwe Bonnes]

Hallo,

compiling a recent CVS checkout, I go a failure with GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL
etc undefined. It seems that a patch from Vitaly regarding wined3d_gl.h from
yesterday evening as notor only partial applied.

Appended patch lets me circumvent that problem.

Bye

[Compile problem] GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL vs. GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI

[H. Verbeet]

On 05/03/06, Uwe Bonnes  wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> compiling a recent CVS checkout, I go a failure with GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL
> etc undefined.

Same problem for me.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-March/045297.html
> It seems that a patch from Vitaly regarding wined3d_gl.h from
> yesterday evening as notor only partial applied.

Well, no, the patch is just like that. It assumes
GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL, GL_STENCIL_BACK_PASS_DEPTH_FAIL and
GL_STENCIL_BACK_PASS_DEPTH_PASS are defined, which is not guaranteed.
> Appended patch lets me circumvent that problem.

I'm not sure if GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL and GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI are
interchangeable, but more importantly it makes the same kind of
assumptions about what's going to be defined.

[Compile problem] GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL vs. GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI

[Uwe Bonnes]

> > > > > "H" == H Verbeet  writes:

...
    >> Appended patch lets me circumvent that problem.
    H> I'm not sure if GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL and GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI are
    H> interchangeable, but more importantly it makes the same kind of
    H> assumptions about what's going to be defined.

I said "circumvent" not "solve"...

[Compile problem] GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL vs. GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI

[H. Verbeet]

On 05/03/06, Uwe Bonnes  wrote:
> I said "circumvent" not "solve"...

Fair enough, but just removing the lines would probably work as well. :-)

[Compile problem] GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL vs. GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI

[Vitaly Budovski]

Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> > > > > > "H" == H Verbeet  writes:
>
> ...
>     >> Appended patch lets me circumvent that problem.
>     H> I'm not sure if GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL and GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI are
>     H> interchangeable, but more importantly it makes the same kind of
>     H> assumptions about what's going to be defined.
>
> I said "circumvent" not "solve"...

This patch 
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-March/024775.html 
should solve the problem with missing defines.