Hi,
I've just had 3 consecutive reports of practically the same failure on redhat 8 with the latest security updates. Basically, nothing works, the wineinstall script messes up and fails to import the initial registry (it seems to get the fstab parsing wrong as well?) and when run wine reports exceptions like this:
17:36 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException code=c0000005 flags=0 addr=0x4037c166 17:36 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException info[0]=00000000 17:36 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException info[1]=409ffc68 17:36 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler calling handler at 0x400c4a00 code=c0000005 flags=0 17:36 <ChipX86> wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... 17:36 <ChipX86> trace:seh:start_debugger Starting debugger "winedbg --debugmsg -all --auto 8 0x18" 17:36 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException code=c0000005 flags=0 addr=0x402af648 17:37 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException info[0]=00000000 17:37 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException info[1]=00000000 17:37 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler calling handler at 0x400c42c8 code=c0000005 flags=0 17:37 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler handler returned 2 17:37 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler calling handler at 0x400c4a00 code=c0000005 flags=10 17:37 <ChipX86> trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler handler returned 1 17:37 <ChipX86> err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0 addr 0x402af648
(pasted from irc)
Can somebody with an up to date redhat box who doesn't mind being a sacrificial lamb look into this? I thought compiling with --with-nptl would fix these problems. BTW all these people were using CVS as of about 10 minutes ago.
thanks -mike
Mike Hearn a écrit:
Hi,
I've just had 3 consecutive reports of practically the same failure on redhat 8 with the latest security updates. Basically, nothing works, the wineinstall script messes up and fails to import the initial registry (it seems to get the fstab parsing wrong as well?) and when run wine reports exceptions like this:
[]
(pasted from irc)
Can somebody with an up to date redhat box who doesn't mind being a sacrificial lamb look into this? I thought compiling with --with-nptl would fix these problems. BTW all these people were using CVS as of about 10 minutes ago.
I compiled it this morning on a fully patched Red Hat 8.0 box and it imported the registry just fine. I didn't use wineinstall, but the process to build rpms is mimmicking wineinstall quite closely. Note that you shouldn't use ./configure's --with-nptl switch, as RedHat 8.0 doesn't use NPTL.
I'll install the produced rpm and tell you what I can gather (I'll be talking to it via ssh w/o X, so it won't be thorough).
Vincent
Vincent Béron a écrit:
I compiled it this morning on a fully patched Red Hat 8.0 box and it imported the registry just fine. I didn't use wineinstall, but the process to build rpms is mimmicking wineinstall quite closely. Note that you shouldn't use ./configure's --with-nptl switch, as RedHat 8.0 doesn't use NPTL.
I'll install the produced rpm and tell you what I can gather (I'll be talking to it via ssh w/o X, so it won't be thorough).
I didn't have a problem running simple command-line programs. We're talking about boxes using the glibc-2.3.2-4.80 packages, right?
Vincent
Vincent,
Wine as of last Friday I know ran fine on an up2date RedHat 8.0 box. The trick was to obtain a clean src tar package or delete your working CVS directory and recheckout and then ./configure (without the --with-nptl), make depend, make, make install on this clean directory
I have upgrade to RedHat 9 since then. And everything works fine there as well as long as you do either
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 before ./configure and wine
or
./configure --with-nptl
Kevin
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 05:11 pm, Vincent Béron wrote:
Vincent Béron a écrit:
I compiled it this morning on a fully patched Red Hat 8.0 box and it imported the registry just fine. I didn't use wineinstall, but the process to build rpms is mimmicking wineinstall quite closely. Note that you shouldn't use ./configure's --with-nptl switch, as RedHat 8.0 doesn't use NPTL.
I'll install the produced rpm and tell you what I can gather (I'll be talking to it via ssh w/o X, so it won't be thorough).
I didn't have a problem running simple command-line programs. We're talking about boxes using the glibc-2.3.2-4.80 packages, right?
Vincent
-
Kevin DeKorte -
Mike Hearn -
Vincent Béron