Re: ntdll/tests: Don't use 0x55/0xaa to avoid any confusion when running with +heap.

[Paul Vriens]

Francois Gouget wrote:
> dlls/ntdll/tests/atom.c |   12 ++++++------
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/atom.c b/dlls/ntdll/tests/atom.c
> index 2de94a0..68f5aba 100644
> --- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/atom.c
> +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/atom.c
> @@ -198,13 +198,13 @@ static void test_NtAtom(void)
>          ok((lstrlenW(testAtom2) * sizeof(WCHAR)) == Len, "Returned wrong length %d\n", Len);
>      Len = 8;
>
> c-        Name[0] = Name[1] = Name[2] = Name[3] = Name[4] = 0x55AA;
> -
>    Name[0] = Name[1] = Name[2] = Name[3] = Name[4] = 0x1337;

What happened there?

ntdll/tests: Don't use 0x55/0xaa to avoid any confusion when running with +heap.

[Francois Gouget]

On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Paul Vriens wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -198,13 +198,13 @@ static void test_NtAtom(void)
> >          ok((lstrlenW(testAtom2) * sizeof(WCHAR)) == Len, "Returned wrong length %d\n", Len);
> >      Len = 8;
> >
> > c-        Name[0] = Name[1] = Name[2] = Name[3] = Name[4] = 0x55AA;
> > -
> >    Name[0] = Name[1] = Name[2] = Name[3] = Name[4] = 0x1337;
>
> What happened there?

I must have hit 'c' while reviewing the patch instead of 'Ctrl+X' to 
send. Apparently Alexandre fixed the patch.