Could somebody with access to a Windows machine please test the attached patch for an oleaut32 test? This test checks for the output format of a negative number, and I have reason to believe that at least one VB application fails because native and builtin oleaut32 differ on the tested behavior.
Alex Villacís Lasso
On Friday 15 July 2005 01:33, Alex Villacís Lasso wrote:
Could somebody with access to a Windows machine please test the attached patch for an oleaut32 test? This test checks for the output format of a
Your test succeeds here on 98, 2k and xp, and fails on Wine:
vartype.c:4618: Test failed: negative zero (got -0)
-Hans
Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Friday 15 July 2005 01:33, Alex Villacís Lasso wrote:
Could somebody with access to a Windows machine please test the attached patch for an oleaut32 test? This test checks for the output format of a
Your test succeeds here on 98, 2k and xp, and fails on Wine:
vartype.c:4618: Test failed: negative zero (got -0)
-Hans
So, this test reveals a genuine difference between Windows and Wine, and should be included in the oleaut32 testsuite. A proposed patch to correct this issue will follow shortly.
Changelog: * Test for behavior of negative underflow formatting
-
Alex Villacís Lasso -
Hans Leidekker