Hello,I scanned Wine 1.7.28 source code with cppcheck 1.63. I hope my scanning will get attention. Threre's lots of false-positives,but,I think,in my file you will see interesting things.
P.S
Thank you for Wine. It is very interesting,and important open source project.
you are welcome to send patches that fix the most interesting things :)
2014-10-06 18:18 GMT+01:00 Игорь Чебаненко chebanenkoigor93@gmail.com:
Hello,I scanned Wine 1.7.28 source code with cppcheck 1.63. I hope my scanning will get attention. Threre's lots of false-positives,but,I think,in my file you will see interesting things.
P.S
Thank you for Wine. It is very interesting,and important open source project.
Hello,
On 10/06/2014 07:18 PM, Игорь Чебаненко wrote:
Hello,I scanned Wine 1.7.28 source code with cppcheck 1.63. I hope my scanning will get attention. Threre's lots of false-positives,but,I think,in my file you will see interesting things.
thanks for your report, a run of ccpcheck on Wine takes quite a few hours.
But your report will be ignored like the ton of previous cppcheck reports for Wine. There are way too many false-positives in the cppcheck output. Thus the signal to noise ratio is very poor in cppcheck and basically not worth the effort to look at it; there are better tools out there.
I've run cppcheck myself a few weeks ago on Wine. But after the 10th interesting warning/error turned out to be again just a C code misparse or misguided heuristic I stopped.
So if you found some valid errors/warnings and confirmed those aren't false-positives then please share them. That will would help us a lot.
bye michael