Re: [05/17] gdiplus: GdipMeasureString should apply its internal scaling factors to layout rectangle.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Dmitry Timoshkov  writes:
> dlls/gdiplus/graphics.c       | 10 ++++++++--
>  dlls/gdiplus/tests/graphics.c | 29 -----------------------------
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

This fails here on 64-bit:

../../../../wine/tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdiplus.dll -T ../../.. -p gdiplus_test.exe.so ../../../../wine/dlls/gdiplus/tests/graphics.c && touch graphics.ok
graphics.c:3609: Test failed: Expected 100.000000, got 98.999786
graphics.c:3609: Test failed: Expected 100.000000, got 98.999786
graphics.c:3609: Test failed: Expected 100.000000, got 98.999786
graphics.c:3609: Test failed: Expected 100.000000, got 98.999786
make: *** [graphics.ok] Error 4

[05/17] gdiplus: GdipMeasureString should apply its internal scaling factors to layout rectangle.

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Alexandre Julliard  wrote:
> This fails here on 64-bit:
>
> ../../../../wine/tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdiplus.dll -T ../../.. -p gdiplus_test.exe.so ../../../../wine/dlls/gdiplus/tests/graphics.c && touch graphics.ok
> graphics.c:3609: Test failed: Expected 100.000000, got 98.999786
> graphics.c:3609: Test failed: Expected 100.000000, got 98.999786
> graphics.c:3609: Test failed: Expected 100.000000, got 98.999786
> graphics.c:3609: Test failed: Expected 100.000000, got 98.999786

Changing the precision should help I'd guess. I'll resend if manually
adjusting the patch is not acceptable.