On 12/04/2011 01:33 AM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
me> Could you explain what that "Sort Assigned" means? author> I was planning on sorting the button/action mappings putting the ones which already have an assigned mapping first, and then all the others.
- AUTOCHECKBOX "Sort Assigned Mappings", IDC_CHECKBOXSORT, 120, 215, 90, 8
A better way of saying this would be "Show assigned first".
Vitaliy.
2011/12/4 Vitaliy Margolen wine-devel@kievinfo.com:
On 12/04/2011 01:33 AM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
me> Could you explain what that "Sort Assigned" means? author> I was planning on sorting the button/action mappings putting the ones which already have an assigned mapping first, and then all the others.
- AUTOCHECKBOX "Sort Assigned Mappings", IDC_CHECKBOXSORT, 120, 215,
90, 8
A better way of saying this would be "Show assigned first".
That doesn't convey the idea of sorting, but only of categorization, i.e. (all assigned in whatever order) followed by (all unassigned ones)
I'm also not sure explicitly telling where they appear is necessary: that should be obvious from the UI. Sthg like "Sort Assigned Mappings and Show them first" is probably overkill IMHO.
Frédéric
To be fair the idea IS categorization, as it doesn't matter if the buttons are sorted in a particular order between them. The original ConfigureDevices dialog is here http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb206296%28v=vs.85%29.aspx , you can see the checkbox there. I think "Show assigned first" is better too.
2011/12/4 Lucas Zawacki lfzawacki@gmail.com:
To be fair the idea IS categorization, as it doesn't matter if the buttons are sorted in a particular order between them. The original ConfigureDevices dialog is here http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb206296%28v=vs.85%29.aspx , you can see the checkbox there. I think "Show assigned first" is better too.
Right, I'll use that in a reviewed patch, likely with a message context indicating it pertains to mappings. That should probably do it.
Frédéric