emmanuel maillard wrote:
Changelog : kernel/proces.c : Initialize darwin removable devices
I appreciate you splitting up your patches for easier review, but patches are meant to be independent atomic changes that improve the code. However, if Alexandre applied this patch alone then Wine wouldn't compile any more and this isn't acceptable.
Hi,
Thanks for the comment, i agree with it but i was thinking than keeping separated patches was better than (in this case) merging #2 + #3 + #5 in a big patch.
Any tricks are welcome.
Thanks
Emmanuel
Le 30 déc. 05 à 13:08, Robert Shearman a écrit :
emmanuel maillard wrote:
Changelog : kernel/proces.c : Initialize darwin removable devices
I appreciate you splitting up your patches for easier review, but patches are meant to be independent atomic changes that improve the code. However, if Alexandre applied this patch alone then Wine wouldn't compile any more and this isn't acceptable.
-- Rob Shearman
emmanuel maillard wrote:
On 30 déc. 05, at 13:08, Robert Shearman wrote:
I appreciate you splitting up your patches for easier review, but patches are meant to be independent atomic changes that improve the code. However, if Alexandre applied this patch alone then Wine wouldn't compile any more and this isn't acceptable.
Any tricks are welcome.
Use git to create your separate patches (git format-patch) [1] from the small incremental changes you've committed to your own git repository.
Pierre.
Thanks, i will take a look at git.
Emmanuel
Le 31 déc. 05 à 13:38, Pierre d'Herbemont a écrit :
emmanuel maillard wrote:
On 30 déc. 05, at 13:08, Robert Shearman wrote:
I appreciate you splitting up your patches for easier review, but patches are meant to be independent atomic changes that improve the code. However, if Alexandre applied this patch alone then Wine wouldn't compile any more and this isn't acceptable.
Any tricks are welcome.
Use git to create your separate patches (git format-patch) [1] from the small incremental changes you've committed to your own git repository.
Pierre.