[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
hurtta+wine@leija.mh.fmi.fi wrote:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-April/046196.html
It's OK that most people don't have fontforge installed, that just means that people who can't cope with compiling from source and can't satisfy all the required dependencies to create a working binary shouldn't do it. They need to use a prepackaged one from a confidential source who knows what is needed and how to resolve the dependencies.
Perhaps because there is NO binary available on list of http://www.winehq.org/site/download
Then they can check their distributions source package tree (pkgsrc, ports, etc.) or binary tree (which compliments pkgsrc, ports, etc. and is compatable.)
I mean, come on, can it be that hard to look in ports?
If distribution is 4 years old, wine is also.
Distributions works good enough, but 4 year old is little different.
Or have you different opinion?