Re: [4/8] WineD3D: Support the full amount of constants in GLSL

[Henri Verbeet]

2009/4/9 Stefan Dösinger :
>      if(pshader) {
> -
>        max_constantsF = GL_LIMITS(pshader_constantsF) - (MAX_CONST_B / 4) - MAX_CONST_I - 2;
> -
>        max_constantsF = min(This->baseShader.limits.constant_float, max_constantsF);
> -
>        /* No indirect addressing here */
> -
>        max_constantsF = GL_LIMITS(pshader_constantsF);
>    } else {

Actually, can't at least 2.x pixel shaders do relative addressing as well?

[4/8] WineD3D: Support the full amount of constants in GLSL

[Stefan Dösinger]

Am Freitag, 10. April 2009 11:52:31 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> 2009/4/9 Stefan Dösinger :
> >      if(pshader) {
> > -
> >        max_constantsF = GL_LIMITS(pshader_constantsF) -
> >
> > (MAX_CONST_B / 4) - MAX_CONST_I - 2; -            max_constantsF =
> > min(This->baseShader.limits.constant_float, max_constantsF); +           
> > /* No indirect addressing here */
> > -
> >        max_constantsF = GL_LIMITS(pshader_constantsF);
> >    } else {
>
> Actually, can't at least 2.x pixel shaders do relative addressing as well?

Varying addressing, not uniform addressing