On 6/11/06, Simon Kissane skissane@gmail.com wrote:
In WinXP, these functions are implemented in iphlpapi.dll as well as icmp.dll (Win2000). They are already in Wine's icmp.dll, so forward the iphlpapi to icmp.dll
Being its a small amount of code in icmp.dll I think we should just duplicate it. Our dependancies should really match windows and the last time I looked iphlpapi did not depend on icmp.dll in win2k.
"Steven Edwards" winehacker@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/11/06, Simon Kissane skissane@gmail.com wrote:
In WinXP, these functions are implemented in iphlpapi.dll as well as icmp.dll (Win2000). They are already in Wine's icmp.dll, so forward the iphlpapi to icmp.dll
Being its a small amount of code in icmp.dll I think we should just duplicate it. Our dependancies should really match windows and the last time I looked iphlpapi did not depend on icmp.dll in win2k.
In XP SP2 it's icmp.dll who forwards its entry points to iphlpapi.dll, so we need to move some code around to accomplish the same thing.
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
In XP SP2 it's icmp.dll who forwards its entry points to iphlpapi.dll, so we need to move some code around to accomplish the same thing.
Curious; what happens when this is implemented and wine is running in eg. win98 mode? Won't there technically be a discrepancy of some sort?
-
Dmitry Timoshkov -
Molle Bestefich -
Steven Edwards