Re: user32/tests: show that windows avoids creating loops in a menu tree, probably by limiting the depth of such tree.

[Paul Vriens]

Rein Klazes wrote:
> Show the problem with the application in bug report #12171.
> +todo_wine
> - ok( !ret ||
> -
>        broken( 0), /* win98, NT */
> -
>        "ModifyMenu should have failed.\n");

Hi Rein,

We have a test failure on NT4 below after this patch. Shouldn't the 
"broken( 0)" be "broken( ret)" ?

user32/tests: show that windows avoids creating loops in a menu tree, probably by limiting the depth of such tree.

[Rein Klazes]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:19:02 +0200, you wrote:
> Rein Klazes wrote:
> > Show the problem with the application in bug report #12171.
> > +todo_wine
> > - ok( !ret ||
> > -
> >        broken( 0), /* win98, NT */
> > -
> >        "ModifyMenu should have failed.\n");
>
> Hi Rein,
>
> We have a test failure on NT4 below after this patch. Shouldn't the 
> "broken( 0)" be "broken( ret)" ?

Indeed, I must have been confused.

Rein.