Daniel Jelinski djelinski1@gmail.com writes:
From 7243b3594c9c0b13770ede1ab32d4dd1329b1dd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Jelinski djelinski1@gmail.com Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:37:15 +0200 Subject: atl80: prefer native, if present
dlls/atl80/atl80.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
There's no reason to do that, most of the dll is already implemented.
2012/6/18, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org:
Daniel Jelinski djelinski1@gmail.com writes:
From 7243b3594c9c0b13770ede1ab32d4dd1329b1dd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Jelinski djelinski1@gmail.com Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:37:15 +0200 Subject: atl80: prefer native, if present
dlls/atl80/atl80.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
There's no reason to do that, most of the dll is already implemented.
It hides at least bug [1] from the end user, since the application comes with a bundled atl80 and works fine with it. It would probably also hide [2], since that application was reported to work under wine-1.4, so probably installs atl80 as well. Leaving it as-is means that users will need to set atl80 to native in order to get these applications to run properly, at least for the time being.
Regards, Daniel
[1] http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30444 [2] http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30906
Daniel Jelinski djelinski1@gmail.com writes:
2012/6/18, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org:
There's no reason to do that, most of the dll is already implemented.
It hides at least bug [1] from the end user, since the application comes with a bundled atl80 and works fine with it. It would probably also hide [2], since that application was reported to work under wine-1.4, so probably installs atl80 as well. Leaving it as-is means that users will need to set atl80 to native in order to get these applications to run properly, at least for the time being.
We want to fix bugs, not hide them.
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Daniel Jelinski