Re: [PATCH 2/6] dxgi: Add interface for IDXGISurface1 [try 2]

[Jacek Caban]

On 02/10/15 13:11, Martell Malone wrote:
> Before I resubmit 4 and 6 however I need to know if I should have
> "include:" or "dxgi:" + "d3d11:" in them as these create new files

We already have both variants in Git history and there was never a
problem with it. If you ask me, use whatever you prefer.

Jacek

[PATCH 2/6] dxgi: Add interface for IDXGISurface1 [try 2]

[Stefan Dösinger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 2015-02-10 um 13:17 schrieb Jacek Caban:
> On 02/10/15 13:11, Martell Malone wrote:
> > Before I resubmit 4 and 6 however I need to know if I should have
> > "include:" or "dxgi:" + "d3d11:" in them as these create new 
> > files
>
> We already have both variants in Git history and there was never a
>  problem with it. If you ask me, use whatever you prefer.

Yes, this was my bad. Keep "dxgi" for dxgi header patches and "d3d11"
for d3d11 header patches.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=elPn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[PATCH 2/6] dxgi: Add interface for IDXGISurface1 [try 2]

[Martell Malone]

> Yes, this was my bad. Keep "dxgi" for dxgi header patches and "d3d11"
> for d3d11 header patches.

Okay great well at least we have 2 of 6 sorted.
I will redo the other 4 now. :)

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Stefan Dösinger 
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 2015-02-10 um 13:17 schrieb Jacek Caban:
> > On 02/10/15 13:11, Martell Malone wrote:
> > > Before I resubmit 4 and 6 however I need to know if I should have
> > > "include:" or "dxgi:" + "d3d11:" in them as these create new
> > > files
> >
> > We already have both variants in Git history and there was never a
> >  problem with it. If you ask me, use whatever you prefer.
>
> Yes, this was my bad. Keep "dxgi" for dxgi header patches and "d3d11"
> for d3d11 header patches.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU2hQpAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMw9DIP/j06y+HuWrf9EF8xLvGsGtgt
> UHuxizNftqQO2himHd7LNhnr1kFxFrM/3ACLIjHKlKpJq8WyTDZeVpbdNt0tcfto
> tX8Sc2gPlwjOckLuUrnj2yEth4+Q2Ns+4hyZNBB+pBJQ7k+Bq7UJ34Bm0qRDD0VG
> SUHpTwlR/tIHAadPO+gTjnyCjA3lRNDRr754dQBsiH2IMNcjLAWE1FYE9zJf6YXo
> Z6OFH+7qMSkRPlv1zNBMQfPo/irg08eq2EMd28hytFwqweZ3TqiCpdi+akYbZocS
> a9eUWDbkC8VCYE9BFdhL2xbxF+bcryEXbHSqUeU5NBihIXMLN1SLr0Bq9GK5PSnU
> 2mRXV1vxuKKQ/ncgB4vdJUEKo0hhKFpZy8FDpB3tc11zIFrLlgFBEnSSQDEl/AHQ
> JZKiCoGM+FWB5IiRlxZghD3SqL1glOceWrdiOqJgOTjcYfU8QGzziPVOkvvbIcPP
> Ac6bZA5XuaHFHSvBooEg13BsXNJFH++0n9QVIX3zrSqE0RTwJjSfoPnqWukpEaCZ
> RRCSlN7RnLGwRsovYbyn+BiDU3p06CzGf4R+zxew4ZVahe0Vu2uwBc0e/fdEu31M
> RsSL3hlAEhLVx+nHf8TFpU5xduPVISLbNyCbQhP3HCImYvzNn74Y/qbiiFm79o3n
> j3FXUBPKBh/NU+YdQVRS
> =elPn
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----