Hi,
The Wine tests are now passing on a Windows XP machine (http://test.winehq.org/data/4b27dfec939d131c9d7e09f97f14dfc7dabe8843/#group_...). Two of the other four only have 2 or 3 failures.
The 2003 group has 3 machines with 1 failure each (urlmon:protocol on one, user32:menu on the others).
Congratulations to everyone involved fixing the tests!
- Reece
Reece Dunn wrote:
Hi,
The Wine tests are now passing on a Windows XP machine (http://test.winehq.org/data/4b27dfec939d131c9d7e09f97f14dfc7dabe8843/#group_...). Two of the other four only have 2 or 3 failures.
The 2003 group has 3 machines with 1 failure each (urlmon:protocol on one, user32:menu on the others).
Congratulations to everyone involved fixing the tests!
- Reece
It's not the first one though. We had one or two the last weeks. The biggest problem besides getting to 0 is consistency.
Have a look at Alasdair's Wine box. It succeeded a few times but also has tests that intermittently fail. The same is true for a lot of Windows boxes.
Nonetheless, we are in a far better position than a few months ago. And after Juan's batch it will be even better.
Having a low rate of failures also lowers the burden for people to fix the last remaining ones instead of staring at a red page ;)
Just some numbers for my W95, W98, NT4, W2K, W2K3 and Vista boxes:
June-24-2008 : 21.7% test failures Aug-26-2008 : 19.7% Nov-14-2008 : 9.8% And yesterday : 6.1%
-
Paul Vriens -
Reece Dunn