Re: wineps include fix.

[Ian Pilcher]

David Hammerton wrote:
> it should be
>         #include <freetype/ftsnames.h>
> instead of
>         #include <freetype/ftnames.h>

David -

It's definitely ftnames.h on my system (Red Hat 7.1).  What version of
FreeType do you have?

wineps include fix.

[Ove Kaaven]

On Sun, 20 May 2001, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> David Hammerton wrote:
> > it should be
> >         #include <freetype/ftsnames.h>
> > instead of
> >         #include <freetype/ftnames.h>
>
> David -
>
> It's definitely ftnames.h on my system (Red Hat 7.1).  What version of
> FreeType do you have?

Same as everyone else with cutting-edge Debian? These are post-2.0.2
snapshots, according to the changelog.

Package: libfreetype6-dev
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Installed-Size: 2428
Maintainer: Anthony Fok 
Source: freetype
Version: 2.0.2.20010514-1
Replaces: freetype0-dev, freetype1-dev
Depends: libfreetype6 (= 2.0.2.20010514-1), libc6-dev
Conflicts: freetype0-dev, freetype1 (<= 1.0.0.1998-03-22-1), freetype1-dev
Description: FreeType 2 font engine, development files

wineps include fix.

[Ian Pilcher]

Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Same as everyone else with cutting-edge Debian? These are post-2.0.2
> snapshots, according to the changelog.

I just checked, and they appear to have changed the name between 2.0.1
and 2.0.2.  I can't help wondering how the FreeType people expect any-
one to keep up with this.

I guess I can do an autoconf check specifically for 2.0.1.  I simply
refuse to try to #ifdef every point release of FreeType.  Down that road
lies madness.

EMAIL REJECTED. RE: Re: wineps include fix.

<!! You are not on my whitelist, to avoid spam, I have not recieved your email !!>

If your message was not Spam or USE, I strongly apologize for the inconvenice cause by this block, but the ammount of spam recieved on this email address (around 10 per day) is too much for me, and I refuse to read it, so please, accept this appology and resend your message to the address below.
  Thank you for your time.

This message was generated by antispam
  Your message was not accepted either because:
    * I don't recognize your address, or 
    * The magic cookie in the 'dated' or 'sender' address you sent to has expired or is invalid.
  You can contact me using the address:

but it will only work for the next 5 days.
  If you're just sending me SPAM/UCE, buzz off.

Regards,
  David Hammerton
  aka crazney
--your email--

On Sun, 20 May 2001, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> David Hammerton wrote:
> > it should be
> >         #include <freetype/ftsnames.h>
> > instead of
> >         #include <freetype/ftnames.h>
>
> David -
>
> It's definitely ftnames.h on my system (Red Hat 7.1).  What version of
> FreeType do you have?

Same as everyone else with cutting-edge Debian? These are post-2.0.2
snapshots, according to the changelog.

Package: libfreetype6-dev
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Installed-Size: 2428
Maintainer: Anthony Fok 
Source: freetype
Version: 2.0.2.20010514-1
Replaces: freetype0-dev, freetype1-dev
Depends: libfreetype6 (= 2.0.2.20010514-1), libc6-dev
Conflicts: freetype0-dev, freetype1 (<= 1.0.0.1998-03-22-1), freetype1-dev
Description: FreeType 2 font engine, development files