On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:38:11PM -0500, Aric Stewart wrote:
The behavior for wsprintfA is different that for wsprintf16 in how it handles NULLs being passed as character parameters. This patch fixes that.
Hmm, can't you add a small comment inside the code that actually mentions this remarkable difference ? I think we should make every effort possible to ensure that important differences between architectures are being preserved as well as possible.
I think this is part of what the change log is for.
Alexandre has committed the patch, i will ask him if he wants me to document something further and submit another patch.
-aric
Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:38:11PM -0500, Aric Stewart wrote:
The behavior for wsprintfA is different that for wsprintf16 in how it handles NULLs being passed as character parameters. This patch fixes that.
Hmm, can't you add a small comment inside the code that actually mentions this remarkable difference ? I think we should make every effort possible to ensure that important differences between architectures are being preserved as well as possible.
-- Andreas Mohr Stauferstr. 6, D-71272 Renningen, Germany
-
Andreas Mohr -
Aric Stewart