Re: New conformance test for user32.dll

[Duane Clark]

Tony Lambregts wrote:
> Ok. then
>
> Change Log: Clarify patch requirements.
>
> Files changed: documentation/patches.sgml
> Index: patches.sgml
>
> RCS file: /home/wine/wine/documentation/patches.sgml,v
> retrieving revision 1.6
> diff -u -r1.6 patches.sgml
> --- patches.sgml    18 Feb 2003 23:23:35 -0000    1.6
> +++ patches.sgml    5 Mar 2003 21:01:34 -0000
> @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@
>        </para>
>        <para>
>          For additions: mention that you have some new files and
> -
>    include them as either separate attachments or by appending
> -
>    the <command>diff -u /dev/null /my/new/file</command> output of 
>
> them

^^^^

Which demonstrates one of the complications with inlined plain text, 
because generally extra effort is required to prevent undesired word wrap.

New conformance test for user32.dll

[Duane Clark]

Duane Clark wrote:
> Which demonstrates one of the complications with inlined plain text, 
> because generally extra effort is required to prevent undesired word wrap.

Perhaps what might reduce this problem is to explicitely document for 
every common mailer, a method that will produce the desired format.