Re: Fix small bug in RtlFindMostSignificantBit (Attachment as Mime Base64) [Virus checked]

[Dan Kegel]

[e-mail] wrote:
> This time I configured Lotus Notes to create the attachment
> as Mime Base64 conversion. (The attachment in the other Mail
> was in Mime Quoted-Printable format). Please tell me
> which attachment format is most useable.

They were both base64, from what I could tell.

Suggestion: turn off HTML email when posting to
the wine mailing lists.  Plain text is much easier
for many people to read.

Minor nit: most people, when they attach patches, use
a filename that ends in .patch.
- Dan

Fix small bug in RtlFindMostSignificantBit (Attachment as Mime Base64) [Virus checked]

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Suggestion: turn off HTML email when posting to
> the wine mailing lists.  Plain text is much easier
> for many people to read.

In fact, HTML mail is frowned upon around here :)
> Minor nit: most people, when they attach patches, use
> a filename that ends in .patch.

I'd say most people use .diff, but maybe that's just me...

Fix small bug in RtlFindMostSignificantBit (Attachment as Mime Base64) [Virus checked]

[Tony Lambregts]

Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Suggestion: turn off HTML email when posting to
> > the wine mailing lists.  Plain text is much easier
> > for many people to read.
>
> In fact, HTML mail is frowned upon around here :)
> > Minor nit: most people, when they attach patches, use
> > a filename that ends in .patch.
>
> I'd say most people use .diff, but maybe that's just me...

It makes no difference what extention you use and I see all kinds. 
Lately I have taken to .diff.txt since mozilla mangles my sgml diffs 
without the .txt extention. The main idea is to make it possible for 
anyone to view the patch inline. From what I have seen most mailers will 
inline .txt extention attachments.