Hi all,
Got this message from Marvin about "formatting", but I'm not sure what could have triggered this. Getting picky I see the parens at the update_relative_valuators function aren't alright given surrounding code style, but I see nothing specifically against https://wiki.winehq.org/Submitting_Patches#Code_guidelines or https://source.winehq.org/patches/#legend
Is there anything actually wrong? I'll be happy to send an updated patch.
Cheers, Carlos
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Marvin testbot@winehq.org wrote:
Thank you for your contribution to Wine!
This is an automated notification to let you know that your patch has been reviewed and its status set to "Formatting".
This means that there are some formatting issues with your patch. Either the author's full name, email address, or Signed-off-by headers are missing, indentation is messed up (usually from editing with a non-standard tab size), or there are gratuitous formatting changes to the code. You need to resend a fixed patch.
If you do not understand the reason for this status, disagree with our assessment, or are simply not sure how to proceed next, please ask for clarification by replying to this email.
Carlos Garnacho carlosg@gnome.org writes:
Hi all,
Got this message from Marvin about "formatting", but I'm not sure what could have triggered this. Getting picky I see the parens at the update_relative_valuators function aren't alright given surrounding code style, but I see nothing specifically against https://wiki.winehq.org/Submitting_Patches#Code_guidelines or https://source.winehq.org/patches/#legend
Is there anything actually wrong? I'll be happy to send an updated patch.
Sorry, the "formatting" status was my mistake. It was meant to be marked "deferred", as in being too large to go in during code freeze.
Hi Alexandre,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
Carlos Garnacho carlosg@gnome.org writes:
Hi all,
Got this message from Marvin about "formatting", but I'm not sure what could have triggered this. Getting picky I see the parens at the update_relative_valuators function aren't alright given surrounding code style, but I see nothing specifically against https://wiki.winehq.org/Submitting_Patches#Code_guidelines or https://source.winehq.org/patches/#legend
Is there anything actually wrong? I'll be happy to send an updated patch.
Sorry, the "formatting" status was my mistake. It was meant to be marked "deferred", as in being too large to go in during code freeze.
Oh, sure, that's perfectly understandable. Congrats for the ongoing 2.0 release!
Cheers, Carlos