Some statistics about the 1.0->1.2 development cycle

[Wolfram Sang]

Hello,

I am going to speak about my "getting into wine development" at FrosCon 
(near Bonn/Germany) next weekend. During preparation, I was interested 
in some numbers, so I roughly modified 'kps' (kernel patch statistics) 
for wine. The outcome for the 1.0->1.2 cycle can be found here, if 
somebody is interested (just make sure you read the README first):

http://www.the-dreams.de/wine/winekpsstats10-12.tar.gz

So far, not too surprising IMHO, although I probably missed a number of 
people. I am open for comments, if there are some.

Have a nice sunday,

Wolfram

[Michael Stefaniuc]

Hello Wolfram,

On 08/15/2010 05:42 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> I am going to speak about my "getting into wine development" at FrosCon
> (near Bonn/Germany) next weekend. During preparation, I was interested
> in some numbers, so I roughly modified 'kps' (kernel patch statistics)
> for wine. The outcome for the 1.0->1.2 cycle can be found here, if
> somebody is interested (just make sure you read the README first):
>
> http://www.the-dreams.de/wine/winekpsstats10-12.tar.gz
>
> So far, not too surprising IMHO, although I probably missed a number of
> people. I am open for comments, if there are some.

you'll have to reassign my patches to the "(None)" category. While I do 
work for Red Hat I'm working there as a network engineer, not as a 
developer. Wine is pure hobby for me and Red Hat doesn't pay me a cent 
for that; even my trips to the WineConfs are payed out of my own pocket.

bye
    michael

[Marcus Meissner]

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:13:12PM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Hello Wolfram,
>
> On 08/15/2010 05:42 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > I am going to speak about my "getting into wine development" at FrosCon
> > (near Bonn/Germany) next weekend. During preparation, I was interested
> > in some numbers, so I roughly modified 'kps' (kernel patch statistics)
> > for wine. The outcome for the 1.0->1.2 cycle can be found here, if
> > somebody is interested (just make sure you read the README first):
> >
> > http://www.the-dreams.de/wine/winekpsstats10-12.tar.gz
> >
> > So far, not too surprising IMHO, although I probably missed a number of
> > people. I am open for comments, if there are some.
>
> you'll have to reassign my patches to the "(None)" category. While I do 
> work for Red Hat I'm working there as a network engineer, not as a 
> developer. Wine is pure hobby for me and Red Hat doesn't pay me a cent for 
> that; even my trips to the WineConfs are payed out of my own pocket.

Similar for me ... "[e-mail]" is my private account and means
private work.

(The [e-mail] account is however for work I have done on SUSE time.)

Ciao, Marcus

[Henri Verbeet]

On 15 August 2010 19:28, Marcus Meissner  wrote:
> Similar for me ... "[e-mail]" is my private account and means
> private work.

Similar split for me, although the amount of patches from
[e-mail] after 1.0 is probably trivial.

[Francois Gouget]

On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Marcus Meissner wrote:
[...]
> Similar for me ... "[e-mail]" is my private account and means
> private work.
>
> (The [e-mail] account is however for work I have done on SUSE time.)

Same split here: [e-mail] patches were for work and 
[e-mail] are for personal stuff.

[Wolfram Sang]

> you'll have to reassign my patches to the "(None)" category. While I do

Will do, of course. Also for all the other requests I get/got.
> for that; even my trips to the WineConfs are payed out of my own pocket.

Sounds familiar ;)

Regards,

Wolfram

[GOUJON Alexandre]

Rather interesting , thanks !
But just for accuracy, I'm a frenchman.

[Wolfram Sang]

> But just for accuracy, I'm a frenchman.

Ah, now I remember what I wanted to add to the README :)
I did not change anything in the built-in country-detection which is 
still quite experimental, even upstream. Please just ignore it. I once 
thought about removing it, might do so later on.

Thanks,

Wolfram