On 05.07.2017 21:23, André Hentschel wrote:
Signed-off-by: André Hentschel nerv@dawncrow.de
dlls/vcomp/main.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
Just recently it was mentioned on the mailing lists that compilers do not support ms_va_list on ARM64 yet. Does your code rely on any compiler patches, or do you assume that va_list == ms_va_list?
Am 06.07.2017 um 19:55 schrieb Sebastian Lackner:
On 05.07.2017 21:23, André Hentschel wrote:
Signed-off-by: André Hentschel nerv@dawncrow.de
dlls/vcomp/main.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
Just recently it was mentioned on the mailing lists that compilers do not support ms_va_list on ARM64 yet. Does your code rely on any compiler patches, or do you assume that va_list == ms_va_list?
Yes, take it as a WineLib only patch which should be improved as soon as there is some compilersupport out there. The ARM64 port was WineLib only from the beginning, no need to change this status until we fix the ABI problems.
On 07.07.2017 09:44, André Hentschel wrote:
Am 06.07.2017 um 19:55 schrieb Sebastian Lackner:
On 05.07.2017 21:23, André Hentschel wrote:
Signed-off-by: André Hentschel nerv@dawncrow.de
dlls/vcomp/main.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
Just recently it was mentioned on the mailing lists that compilers do not support ms_va_list on ARM64 yet. Does your code rely on any compiler patches, or do you assume that va_list == ms_va_list?
Yes, take it as a WineLib only patch which should be improved as soon as there is some compilersupport out there. The ARM64 port was WineLib only from the beginning, no need to change this status until we fix the ABI problems.
Okay, thanks for the explanation. It is just important to keep in mind that all those wrappers have to be updated as soon as proper compiler support is available. ;)