Re: wine-patches Digest, Vol 47, Issue 40

[Piotr Caban]

> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:37:48 +0200
> From: Piotr Caban 
> Subject: jscript: Added Date_getFullYear and Date_getUTCFullYear
>    implementation	(3/7)
> To: [e-mail]
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> dlls/jscript/date.c       |   73
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  dlls/jscript/tests/api.js |    9 +++++
>  2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Whats wrong with this patch?

All the date expressions (e.g. day_from_year) are copied from ECMA-262
standard specification. Because of the date range it can be keep in
double without error.

Piotr Caban

wine-patches Digest, Vol 47, Issue 40

[Alexandre Julliard]

Piotr Caban  writes:
> Whats wrong with this patch?
>
> All the date expressions (e.g. day_from_year) are copied from ECMA-262
> standard specification. Because of the date range it can be keep in
> double without error.

Look a bit closer at your constant definitions...