Marcelo Duarte wrote:
Hi, The Wine asks if I want to install the Mozilla ActiveX control, however it does not give no indication as to make this. Looking for in the patches, I found failed to meet information. See: http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/10/0492.html That indicates:
[Software\Wine\shdocvw] 1089668326 "Url"="http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/MozillaControl16.exe http://www.iol.ie/%7Elocka/mozilla/MozillaControl16.exe"
But the correct is: [Software\Wine\shdocvw] 1089668326 "MozillaUrl"="http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/MozillaControl16.exe http://www.iol.ie/%7Elocka/mozilla/MozillaControl16.exe" So, I decided to show to the user as to make this. Also I corrected a small error of presentation.
Changelog: Marcelo Duarte Show to the user how to install Mozilla ActiveX on demand
Why not fix the key rather than telling the user to do it?
Rob
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:30:55 -0600, Robert Shearman wrote:
Why not fix the key rather than telling the user to do it?
The reason it's not already fixed BTW is because the moment we do that, we'll overload Adam Locks server (possibly). At minimum we need to contact him and ask permission, most likely we need to arrange our own hosting for it (and maybe signature checking in case of compromised hosts/mirrors ...)
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:30:55 -0600, Robert Shearman wrote:
Why not fix the key rather than telling the user to do it?
The reason it's not already fixed BTW is because the moment we do that, we'll overload Adam Locks server (possibly). At minimum we need to contact him and ask permission, most likely we need to arrange our own hosting for it (and maybe signature checking in case of compromised hosts/mirrors ...)
How about hosting it on SourceForge?
Rob
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:26 -0600, Robert Shearman wrote:
How about hosting it on SourceForge?
Yep, we could, though we'd need to either add extra code to fetch a mirror list, or hard code it (the latter is much easier :).
There's also the issue of checksumming but I think we can duck that for now, if a SourceForge mirror is cracked we all have much bigger problems ...
Mike Hearn escreveu:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:26 -0600, Robert Shearman wrote:
How about hosting it on SourceForge?
Yep, we could, though we'd need to either add extra code to fetch a mirror list, or hard code it (the latter is much easier :).
There's also the issue of checksumming but I think we can duck that for now, if a SourceForge mirror is cracked we all have much bigger problems ...
Someone that has access to sourceforge (packagers?) can upload the file: http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/MozillaControl16.exe And email me the url that I´ll try to do a patch. Thanks.
Le mer 16/02/2005 à 12:39, Mike Hearn a écrit :
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:26 -0600, Robert Shearman wrote:
How about hosting it on SourceForge?
Yep, we could, though we'd need to either add extra code to fetch a mirror list, or hard code it (the latter is much easier :).
We could always not put it in sf's FRS, only in our web space (like Scott's Ubuntu packages).
There's also the issue of checksumming but I think we can duck that for now, if a SourceForge mirror is cracked we all have much bigger problems ...
I don't recall seeing MD5SUM files for the other Wine files on sf either...
Vincent