Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de writes:
Signed-off-by: Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de
Around 95 use cases. No, I do *not* want to do change RECT struct assignments to CopyRect().
Good, but how about changing CopyRect to assignments? ;-)
On 06/21/2016 05:01 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de writes:
Signed-off-by: Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de
Around 95 use cases. No, I do *not* want to do change RECT struct assignments to CopyRect().
Good, but how about changing CopyRect to assignments? ;-)
Actually I lied! ;)
I wanted to write a script to check for code similar to: if (!r1 || !r2) goto END; *r1 = *r2; and replace it with if (!CopyRect(r1, r2)) goto END;
Mainly because it is an interesting coccinelle exercise. Of course I would have tried to make it more palatable by replacing those cases where memcpy() is used instead of the assignment...
But the explicit code is not such a big eyesore. So I can instead remove CopyRect() and mark it as verboten when __WINESOURCE__ is defined.
bye michael