I think the idea was to have a proper idl file eventually.
Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com wrote:
I think the idea was to have a proper idl file eventually.
Amount of autogenerated code in that file is relatively small (actually that's what I just have submitted) and it doesn't worth the trouble to create an idl IMHO. Besides PSDK doesn't have it autogenerated either.
On 4/7/2014 11:32, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com wrote:
I think the idea was to have a proper idl file eventually.
Amount of autogenerated code in that file is relatively small (actually that's what I just have submitted) and it doesn't worth the trouble to create an idl IMHO. Besides PSDK doesn't have it autogenerated either.
The point is to make it autogenerated. I know that PSDK doesn't do that in many places, we don't necessary have to follow.
Actually, Henri, Stefan, what was decided for DirectX headers in that regard? Leave as it is, switch to idls eventually, something else?
On 7 April 2014 09:43, Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, Henri, Stefan, what was decided for DirectX headers in that regard? Leave as it is, switch to idls eventually, something else?
We'd like to generate them from IDL eventually, but I don't think anyone is currently actively working on that.