Fresh valgrind errors in richedit

[Dan Kegel]

Eric, could you have a look at

http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2008-03-17/vg-riched20_editor-diff.txt

There are several new errors of the sort:

+ Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+    at  ME_SetParaFormat (para.c:400)
+    by  ME_SetSelectionParaFormat (para.c:436)
+    by  ME_RTFReadHook (editor.c:662)
+    by  RTFGetToken (reader.c:417)
+    by  RTFRead (reader.c:333)
+    by  ME_StreamIn (editor.c:1095)
+    by  RichEditWndProc_common (editor.c:2432)
+    by  RichEditWndProcA (editor.c:3237)
+    by  (within /home/dank/wine-git/dlls/user32/user32.dll.so)
+    by  call_window_proc (winproc.c:457)
+    by  WINPROC_call_window (winproc.c:2207)
+    by  call_window_proc (message.c:1615)
+    by  send_message (message.c:2430)
+    by  SendMessageA (message.c:2575)
+    by  test_EM_SETTEXTMODE (editor.c:471)
+    by  func_editor (editor.c:2705)
+    by  run_test (test.h:406)
+    by  main (test.h:455)

[Eric Pouech]

Dan Kegel a écrit :
> Eric, could you have a look at
>
> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2008-03-17/vg-riched20_editor-diff.txt
>
> There are several new errors of the sort:
> - Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> - at  ME_SetParaFormat (para.c:400)
> - by  ME_SetSelectionParaFormat (para.c:436)
> - by  ME_RTFReadHook (editor.c:662)
> - by  RTFGetToken (reader.c:417)
> - by  RTFRead (reader.c:333)
> - by  ME_StreamIn (editor.c:1095)
> - by  RichEditWndProc_common (editor.c:2432)
> - by  RichEditWndProcA (editor.c:3237)
> - by  (within /home/dank/wine-git/dlls/user32/user32.dll.so)
> - by  call_window_proc (winproc.c:457)
> - by  WINPROC_call_window (winproc.c:2207)
> - by  call_window_proc (message.c:1615)
> - by  send_message (message.c:2430)
> - by  SendMessageA (message.c:2575)
> - by  test_EM_SETTEXTMODE (editor.c:471)
> - by  func_editor (editor.c:2705)
> - by  run_test (test.h:406)
> - by  main (test.h:455)

likely the RTF writer that isn't 100% compliant with the RTF specs (or 
my interpretation thereof)
won't have too much time until this week-end anyway, so if some wants to 
look at it before, feel free
A+