-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Matteo,
I'm getting test failures in test_3dc_formats on various machines. Do you have any idea how to change the test without reducing its usefulness? It seems that we're seeing all possible swizzles on Windows.
Geforce 9600, Windows 7: visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x007f7f7f, case 0. visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x007f7f7f, case 1.
Radeon X1600, Windows 7: visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x007fffff, case 0. visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x007fffff, case 1.
This one smells like an implementation problem: Wine or r300g. Looks like the draw fails. visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x00ff00ff, case 0. visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x00ff00ff, case 1.
Cheers, Stefan
2015-02-12 13:06 GMT+01:00 Stefan Dösinger stefandoesinger@gmail.com:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Matteo,
I'm getting test failures in test_3dc_formats on various machines. Do you have any idea how to change the test without reducing its usefulness? It seems that we're seeing all possible swizzles on Windows.
Geforce 9600, Windows 7: visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x007f7f7f, case 0. visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x007f7f7f, case 1.
Radeon X1600, Windows 7: visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x007fffff, case 0. visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x007fffff, case 1.
Yes, I remember you mentioning that. I wrote a couple patches to accept those two results too, but I was thinking about ignoring the G and B components for ATI1N altogether (and do something about the alpha part) as an alternative. So essentially those patches got stuck in my private tree. Do you have a preference on how to fix the test?
This one smells like an implementation problem: Wine or r300g. Looks like the draw fails. visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x00ff00ff, case 0. visual.c:16804: Test failed: Expected color 0x003f3f3f or 0x007f0000, got 0x00ff00ff, case 1.
Yes. Maybe ATI1N isn't supported by the HW? I don't remember which exact r300-class GPU you have but it looks like ATI1N is only supported on R500+, although AFAICS Mesa correctly doesn't report ARB_texture_compression_rgtc with older GPUs. Can you check that the extension (and the EXT_ variant) is or isn't reported as it would be expected?
Cheers, Matteo.
Cheers, Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU3JdCAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwK1EP/RqbMOXv8wkirSvrudJuzOdk /R68iLVBN3wJSuTnGz+gJz4RR3N3hdN3YeI3M+eTHoyqk/4JhKDKSE8M/W94ILEh BYH1m98D/EpphSwkiREcRma4eAFkC3K4U0zvxjOLkLq0BLaK6vAD6BuK97jORqmh i8oZS4vIpayq5DSvi+niNz5Wk/JLo8fu/6049kmY0r7asSYOcl8LEAgynUKRiKDT 6wyEsnC2Y5lKJ4zRMHGmxi/68R3CsxgAODIIW/JKC6/XskEydAM5TZ+h4lOLj0zU fzAkJRwBpwP4nS3XEI2bbMyA5ZLCLfa7Qo+otuUwU6vL6+6v6uwBRWNJtW+rQydk 2ceSfEj+FaoUqlqI8iySRmVkivYDKyp4wZL8/2WlAqstvC40cbYKRsa9YtMZFZF8 WpJip57t2pjAHdHCnAaA5qD7ulrjleAnMq7Yw3WqusA7NWPGWB8W02oKWuzfXYK3 C2byraxi5HQaHfxi5c60+WdJyzKGUhDn9PBdDRHmWJF77msk9x4ktl/DvtBF9XNZ X549ff8otGpJvczCDJZObvLU4qvQmPw6raHda+8qtGj4HcqVu3rq+WNv7+7zvmxk myLKNhYNhxSYzwwLHOTO3XGac2VJ/Gl4BEiBCn1chIAuZRGd2iWB4DMD0ptq4ovw 0CiBK8gTt/f5TsLTTzTl =ZgiK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am 2015-02-12 um 16:59 schrieb Matteo Bruni:
So essentially those patches got stuck in my private tree. Do you have a preference on how to fix the test?
No particular preference.
Yes. Maybe ATI1N isn't supported by the HW?
No, it works. It's the same Radeon X1600 where the Windows result is coming from.
I have one test that creates an invalid command stream that's rejected by the kernel. It may be this one, I have to check.
-
Matteo Bruni -
Stefan Dösinger