Hi all!
I am trying to build wine onto Max OS X/Darwin. I am getting trouble with windres and the *.res files. I would like to know if it would be possible to have winelib running without those resources, I mean, could I build a program and link it fine without those resources?
In a second time I would like to know if you plan to use wrc as the only (without windres) resource manager. I have read in the list something like that, could you give me the confirmation?
Also I would like to know in which measure is the Elf file format implicated in wine (in opposition to darwin's mach-o).
Thanks,
Pierre
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 06:22:56PM +0100, Pierre d'Herbemont wrote:
Hi all!
I am trying to build wine onto Max OS X/Darwin. I am getting trouble with windres and the *.res files. I would like to know if it would be possible to have winelib running without those resources, I mean, could I build a program and link it fine without those resources?
What trouble?
It should just work, be basically just convert bytestreams into a C file.
In a second time I would like to know if you plan to use wrc as the only (without windres) resource manager. I have read in the list something like that, could you give me the confirmation?
Huh?
Also I would like to know in which measure is the Elf file format implicated in wine (in opposition to darwin's mach-o).
It is not, but basically we require shared libraries of some kind.
Ciao, Marcus
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 09:49 PM, Eric Pouech wrote:
Also I would like to know in which measure is the Elf file format implicated in wine (in opposition to darwin's mach-o).
It is not, but basically we require shared libraries of some kind.
(except in winedbg where you somehow rely on some ELF intrinsics)
Ok, for now it shouldn't be a problem (for building winelib). Unless winelib needs winedbg?
++
Pierre
Hi,
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 08:34 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 06:22:56PM +0100, Pierre d'Herbemont wrote:
Hi all!
I am trying to build wine onto Max OS X/Darwin. I am getting trouble with windres and the *.res files. I would like to know if it would be possible to have winelib running without those resources, I mean, could I build a program and link it fine without those resources?
What trouble?
It should just work, be basically just convert bytestreams into a C file.
Hum... more like a compilation problem with binutils and windres. I'll should have dig deeper on this. I will look further :)
In a second time I would like to know if you plan to use wrc as the only (without windres) resource manager. I have read in the list something like that, could you give me the confirmation?
Huh?
"First, windres supports any conversions between .rc, .res, .o files, whereas wrc supports only .rc -> .res. It would be interesting (from the Winelib point of view) to also support .rc and .res -> .o. The other transformations supported by windres (.o -> .res -> .rc) are not as interesting, as they are not used in the build process. " from: http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/12/0168.html
I would like to know if you still plan this. I mean do you plan to use wrc instead of windres?
Also I would like to know in which measure is the Elf file format implicated in wine (in opposition to darwin's mach-o).
It is not, but basically we require shared libraries of some kind.
Ok, thanks a lot, it seems encouraging ;)
Cheers,
Pierre
"First, windres supports any conversions between .rc, .res, .o files, whereas wrc supports only .rc -> .res. It would be interesting (from the Winelib point of view) to also support .rc and .res -> .o. The other transformations supported by windres (.o -> .res -> .rc) are not as interesting, as they are not used in the build process. " from: http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/12/0168.html
I would like to know if you still plan this. I mean do you plan to use wrc instead of windres?
Hmm, as of now we use the "winebuild" tool to convert the .res files into the C structure bytecode, so we have the .res -> .o in a fashion.
Ciao, Marcus
Hey,
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 02:26 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
"First, windres supports any conversions between .rc, .res, .o files, whereas wrc supports only .rc -> .res. It would be interesting (from the Winelib point of view) to also support .rc and .res -> .o. The other transformations supported by windres (.o -> .res -> .rc) are not as interesting, as they are not used in the build process. " from: http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/12/0168.html
I would like to know if you still plan this. I mean do you plan to use wrc instead of windres?
Hmm, as of now we use the "winebuild" tool to convert the .res files into the C structure bytecode, so we have the .res -> .o in a fashion.
I have been away for a while, but after a little investigation I found this in this day CVS status wine/Make.rules.in :
.res.res.o: $(WINDRES) -i $< -o
so I guess that wine still use windres :( ... So I think I will have to work on binutils, or maybe there is something I don't understand... (I hope so ;) )
Pierre
"Pierre d'Herbemont" stegefin@free.fr writes:
I have been away for a while, but after a little investigation I found this in this day CVS status wine/Make.rules.in :
.res.res.o: $(WINDRES) -i $< -o
so I guess that wine still use windres :( ... So I think I will have to work on binutils, or maybe there is something I don't understand... (I hope so ;) )
windres is only used when building PE binaries with mingw. It's not used in the normal build process.