On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 01:42:19 CST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, at 01:40, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
@@ -738,6 +803,8 @@ static long ntsync_char_ioctl(struct file *file, diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h b/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h index 26d1b3d4847f..2e44e7e77776 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h @@ -46,5 +46,7 @@ struct ntsync_wait_args { struct ntsync_wait_args) #define NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_MUTEX _IOWR(NTSYNC_IOC_BASE, 5, \ struct ntsync_mutex_args) +#define NTSYNC_IOC_PUT_MUTEX _IOWR(NTSYNC_IOC_BASE, 6, \
struct ntsync_mutex_args)
In your implementation, this argument is not written back to user space, so I think this should be _IOW rather than than _IORW.
Again, no practical difference here.
Hm, but there is a put_user() at the end of the function, or am I missing something?