Does that mean just because no person has made an bugreport about it yet, it isn't needed now? and then in the future people with the issue will have to wait however many months for a full patch?
seems a bit asinine and silly... Im thinking its time to fork wine into a less strict development enviroment where developers can code more freely not only deal with bugs releasted to games.. which linux shoulndt be used for anyway.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 3:42 PM Marvin testbot@winehq.org wrote:
Thank you for your contribution to Wine!
This is an automated notification to let you know that your patch has been reviewed and its status set to "Rejected".
This means that the patch has been rejected by a reviewer. You should have received a mail explaining why it was rejected. You need to fix the issue and resend the patch, or if you are convinced that your patch is good as is, you should reply to the rejection message with your counterarguments.
If you do not understand the reason for this status, disagree with our assessment, or are simply not sure how to proceed next, please ask for clarification by replying to this email.
Hello Benjamin,
what's up with this attitude? Don't take it personally, just try to plead your case. Surely you have a reason to want those changes to be included?
Regards, Fabian Maurer
On Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2022 00:37:23 CET Benjamin Shefte wrote:
Does that mean just because no person has made an bugreport about it yet, it isn't needed now? and then in the future people with the issue will have to wait however many months for a full patch?
seems a bit asinine and silly... Im thinking its time to fork wine into a less strict development enviroment where developers can code more freely not only deal with bugs releasted to games.. which linux shoulndt be used for anyway.
-
Benjamin Shefte -
Fabian Maurer