"Changhui Liu" liuchanghui@linuxdeepin.com wrote:
- case WM_SYSKEYDOWN:
if (wParam == VK_DOWN)
{
POINT pt;
RECT rect;
GetClientRect(hwnd, &rect);
pt.x = rect.right - GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXVSCROLL)/2;
pt.y = rect.top + GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYHSCROLL)/2;
return DATETIME_LButtonDown (infoPtr, (SHORT)pt.x, (SHORT)pt.y);
I wouldn't be surprised if the control just does SendMessage with an appropriate message to itself. Is it possible to add a message test?
}
Did you miss a 'break;' or a fall through is intentiional? In the latter case please add a proper comment.
Hi Dmitry, Thank you for your advice.
I wouldn't be surprised if the control just does SendMessage with an appropriate message to itself. Is it possible to add a message test?
I found that the messages sent to DateTimePick32 control is different in different windows and wine, for example, 1, In wine, the messages are:
trace:datetime:DATETIME_WindowProc 104, 28, 0 trace:datetime:DATETIME_WindowProc 86, 0, 1e005a trace:datetime:DATETIME_WindowProc 6, 0, 1e005a trace:datetime:DATETIME_WindowProc 8, 1e005a, 0
2, In winxp pro 32bit:
datetime.c:839: 0: expected: nothing - actual: 0104 wp 00000028 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 1: expected: nothing - actual: 0055 wp 00030196 lp 00000003 datetime.c:839: 2: expected: nothing - actual: 0129 wp 00000000 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 3: expected: nothing - actual: 0031 wp 00000000 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 4: expected: nothing - actual: 0014 wp 01010050 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 5: expected: nothing - actual: 007f wp 00000002 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 6: expected: nothing - actual: 007f wp 00000000 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 7: expected: nothing - actual: 007f wp 00000001 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 8: expected: nothing - actual: 000f wp 00000000 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 9: expected: nothing - actual: 0085 wp 5d040652 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 10: expected: nothing - actual: 000d wp 00000208 lp 0022e884 datetime.c:839: 11: expected: nothing - actual: 000d wp 00000208 lp 0022e920 datetime.c:839: 12: expected: nothing - actual: 0014 wp 01010053 lp 00000000
3, In win8 32bit:
datetime.c:839: 0: expected: nothing - actual: 0104 wp 00000028 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 1: expected: nothing - actual: 0055 wp 000300f6 lp 00000003 datetime.c:839: 2: expected: nothing - actual: 0129 wp 00000000 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 3: expected: nothing - actual: 0031 wp 00000000 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 4: expected: nothing - actual: 0014 wp 140105d7 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 5: expected: nothing - actual: 007f wp 00000001 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 6: expected: nothing - actual: 007f wp 00000002 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 7: expected: nothing - actual: 007f wp 00000000 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 8: expected: nothing - actual: 031f wp 00000001 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 9: expected: nothing - actual: 031f wp 00000001 lp 00000000 datetime.c:839: 10: expected: nothing - actual: 000f wp 00000000 lp 00000000
so I think it is not suitable write a message test.
Did you miss a 'break;' or a fall through is intentiional? In the latter case please add a proper comment.
It is the latter case, I attached a new path, please help me review it again when you are free. Thanks a lot.
------------------ Regards, Changhui.
------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Dmitry Timoshkov"dmitry@baikal.ru; Date: Fri, Feb 13, 2015 07:07 PM To: "Changhui Liu"liuchanghui@linuxdeepin.com; Cc: "wine-devel"wine-devel@winehq.org; Subject: Re: comctl32: SysDateTimePick32 control add Alt+down hot key likewindows
"Changhui Liu" liuchanghui@linuxdeepin.com wrote:
- case WM_SYSKEYDOWN:
if (wParam == VK_DOWN)
{
POINT pt;
RECT rect;
GetClientRect(hwnd, &rect);
pt.x = rect.right - GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXVSCROLL)/2;
pt.y = rect.top + GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYHSCROLL)/2;
return DATETIME_LButtonDown (infoPtr, (SHORT)pt.x, (SHORT)pt.y);
I wouldn't be surprised if the control just does SendMessage with an appropriate message to itself. Is it possible to add a message test?
}
Did you miss a 'break;' or a fall through is intentiional? In the latter case please add a proper comment.
On 15.02.2015 19:06, Changhui Liu wrote:
Hi Dmitry, Thank you for your advice.
I wouldn't be surprised if the control just does SendMessage with an appropriate message to itself. Is it possible to add a message test?
I found that the messages sent to DateTimePick32 control is different in different windows and wine, for example,
so I think it is not suitable write a message test.
You only care about DTM_* messages. Do those differ too?
+DWORD WINAPI CheckMonthCalThread (void* param) +{
- int i = 0;
- HWND hWndMonthCal = NULL;
- for (i=0; i<5; ++i)
- {
Sleep(500); /*wait the SysMonthCal32 control to show*/
hWndMonthCal = FindWindowA("SysMonthCal32", NULL);
if (NULL != hWndMonthCal)
{
trace("monthcal=%p\n", hWndMonthCal);
ok(IsWindowVisible(hWndMonthCal), "Expected MonthCal to be visible\n");
/*select a day by click point(0x10, 0x10)*/
PostMessageA(hWndMonthCal, WM_LBUTTONDOWN, 1, MAKEWPARAM(0x10,0x10));
*(HWND*)param = hWndMonthCal;
return TRUE;
}
- }
- ok(0, "Expected MonthCal to be valid\n");
- return 0;
+}
This looks a bit too much. First this needs a regular message test, including testing notifications being sent.
- case WM_SYSKEYDOWN:
if (wParam == VK_DOWN)
{
POINT pt;
RECT rect;
GetClientRect(hwnd, &rect);
pt.x = rect.right - GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXVSCROLL)/2;
pt.y = rect.top + GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYHSCROLL)/2;
return DATETIME_LButtonDown (infoPtr, (SHORT)pt.x, (SHORT)pt.y);
}
/*else continue to DefWindowProcW*/
As I said already, this is too complicated.