Hi,
Since the latest update of the mailing list server, a lot of mails sent to this list are wrongly classified as spam by CodeWeavers' mail server. I've already sent a mail about this to postmaster@codeweavers.com several months ago, but got no reply and nothing appears to have changed.
It seems that the main culprit is the "SINGLE_HEADER_3K" spamassassin check, in combination with a very low spam score threshold (1.0). Below is an example from Stefan Dösinger's last mail (titled "dpnet patches").
Jonas
X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "wine.codeweavers.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Alistair, A while ago I promised to have a closer look at your dpnet patches. ItXs a bit delayed, but here are some comments. How serious are you about dplay? Do you intend to do more work towards implementing it, or is that just wishful thinking on my part? [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 1.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.0 SINGLE_HEADER_3K A single header contains 3K-4K characters 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefandoesinger[at]gmail.com) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
Strange. They must have changed some config options, or the file has moved since Squeeze. I'll look into it and get it a bit less strict.
-Newman
On Fri 31 Jan 2014 07:59:21 AM CST, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Since the latest update of the mailing list server, a lot of mails sent to this list are wrongly classified as spam by CodeWeavers' mail server. I've already sent a mail about this to postmaster@codeweavers.com several months ago, but got no reply and nothing appears to have changed.
It seems that the main culprit is the "SINGLE_HEADER_3K" spamassassin check, in combination with a very low spam score threshold (1.0). Below is an example from Stefan Dösinger's last mail (titled "dpnet patches").
On Jan 31, 2014, at 7:59 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Since the latest update of the mailing list server, a lot of mails sent to this list are wrongly classified as spam by CodeWeavers' mail server. I've already sent a mail about this to postmaster@codeweavers.com several months ago, but got no reply and nothing appears to have changed.
It seems that the main culprit is the "SINGLE_HEADER_3K" spamassassin check, in combination with a very low spam score threshold (1.0). Below is an example from Stefan Dösinger's last mail (titled "dpnet patches").
X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "wine.codeweavers.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Alistair, A while ago I promised to have a closer look at your dpnet patches. ItXs a bit delayed, but here are some comments. How serious are you about dplay? Do you intend to do more work towards implementing it, or is that just wishful thinking on my part? [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 1.0 required) pts rule name description
3.0 SINGLE_HEADER_3K A single header contains 3K-4K characters 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefandoesinger[at]gmail.com) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
I do not see this in the raw email source for that same message as I received it. Would a second SpamAssassin-enabled server (mail.codeweavers.com) have stripped the first server's analysis?
-Ken
-
Jeremy Newman -
Jonas Maebe -
Ken Thomases