Non-applied patches

[Shachar Shemesh]

Hi Alexandre,

I'm just trying to understand whether you are still trying to fight the 
backlog, my patches fell through the cracks, or that you decided not to 
apply them.

I am referring to:
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/01/0399.html
and
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/01/0401.html

If the last option, please explain what is wrong with them.

Sh.

P.S.
A simple mail saying "I'm still fighting the backlog, I'll let you know 
when I've covered all the submitted patches" will suffice, as far as I'm 
concerned.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Shachar Shemesh  writes:
> I am referring to:
> http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/01/0399.html

This one should be applied soon.
> and
> http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/01/0401.html

As you said yourself: "this is not a good patch". It's not fixing the
problem just hiding it.

[Shachar Shemesh]

Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh  writes:
> > I am referring to:
> > http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/01/0399.html
>
> This one should be applied soon.

Great! That's the important one. I'm hoping to get to the point we have 
a charset selecting font dialog (and eliminate the W->A call while wer'e 
at it).
> > and
> > http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/01/0401.html
>
> As you said yourself: "this is not a good patch". It's not fixing the
> problem just hiding it.

Yes. It was a two minute hack, because I happened across the problem.