Re: Remove heap.h

[Jon Griffiths]

Hi,
> > - docA.lpszDocName = WtoA( doc->lpszDocName );
> > - docA.lpszOutput = WtoA( doc->lpszOutput );
> > - docA.lpszDatatype = WtoA( doc->lpszDatatype;
>
> Isn't there a missing parenthesis?

There sure is, I must have deleted it while removing the cruft from
the diff (since it compiles fine on my box at home :). I'll resubmit.

(Dimitrie)
> Because in 99.99% of cases you don't want to convert from W->A.
> If all our functions are Unicode, a W->A conversion is a warning
> sign, and for sure you wouldn't want to encourage people to do
> so by making it any easier.

winapi_check will allready tell us all cross-calls anyway, doesn't
it?
It may be years before all the a to w conversions are done and we are
100% internally unicode, why live with a non standard header that
long?

Cheers,
Jon

=====
"Don't wait for the seas to part, or messiahs to come;
 Don't you sit around and waste this chance..." - Live

[e-mail]

__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com

Remove heap.h

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 07:47:11AM -0800, Jon Griffiths wrote:
> > Because in 99.99% of cases you don't want to convert from W->A.
> > If all our functions are Unicode, a W->A conversion is a warning
> > sign, and for sure you wouldn't want to encourage people to do
> > so by making it any easier.
>
> winapi_check will allready tell us all cross-calls anyway, doesn't it?
> It may be years before all the a to w conversions are done and we are
> 100% internally unicode, why live with a non standard header that long?

Because it provides more reason for fixes. If we make everything tidy,
those problems are less likely to get fixed. It's been a long standing
policy, I doubt that Alexandre will change it. But, then again, he will
make the final call.