The buildbot is alive and well and has been finding real problems of various sorts roughly once a day for some time. I'm not spending much time on it anymore, just watching and tweaking occasionally.
The number of spurious failures is tapering off as I slowly expand the blacklist and polish up the scripts. I plan to turn on email notifications to wine-devel once there have been no spurious failure reports for five days, probably sometime in October.
http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot is up to date in case anyone's interested in details.
How about just sending error emails to the wine-bots list, AJ and the patch author? To be really honest I hate reading all the testbot emails on wine-devel.
J
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
Do you object to Greg's existing testbot emails, too?
Well before I flip the switch to turn on email to wine-devel, I will have a nice history of those emails for viewing, so people can judge the actual added noise level for themselves.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys.wh@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
Do you object to Greg's existing testbot emails, too?
They're annoying when they are spurious...
Octavian
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Octavian Voicu octavian.voicu@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. That's why I've been focusing on reducing the spurious email rate, and won't turn email to wine-devel on until there have been no spurious emails for five days.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
Do you object to Greg's existing testbot emails, too
Kinda, yeah. I read wine-devel for developer comments, insights, development about wine, etc. Bot emails feel kind of wrong here; I especially dislike WTB's because a lot of them are timeout-sort of spam on one odd machine.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 00:33, Jerome Leclanche adys.wh@gmail.com wrote:
Well as long as the test failures remain available from http://source.winehq.org/patches/ (e.g. http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/79447.testfail), I don't see why the list should receive automatic replies/mails.
That should probably be opt-in so interested people can still receive messages on their private email address. Don't know if that's currently possible for WTB, though, or if it's a hardcoded list of recipients.
Maarten probably knows better