Hello, the attached patch consists of a test case for following bug: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12104
This test shows how cygwin's setup checks if a WM_SIZE message was received (by the custom window proc).
In wine only the property page gets such a message - not the sheet.
If I got it right, tests which would fail in wine are prefixed with todo_wine?
I want to ask if this patch looks right for inclusion and if the location (dlls/comctl32/tests/) is right?
Kind regards, Bernhard
On 10/24/2010 05:20 AM, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
If I got it right, tests which would fail in wine are prefixed with todo_wine?
I want to ask if this patch looks right for inclusion and if the location (dlls/comctl32/tests/) is right?
/* disabled because todo_wine would fail because some messages arrive correct in wine
No, it doesn't look right. If you testing for missing messages, then you should test all messages as done in some other places. See dlls/comctl32/tests/msg.h and where it's used.
Vitaliy.